Edwards Sara L, Lee Jessica A, Bell John-Erik, Packer Jonathan D, Ahmad Christopher S, Levine William N, Bigliani Louis U, Blaine Theodore A
Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1456-61. doi: 10.1177/0363546510370937. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
Although there are multiple reports documenting successful outcomes with operative treatment of superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tears, there are few reports on the results of nonoperative treatment.
Nonoperative treatment of SLAP tears will result in improved outcomes over pretreatment values using validated, patient-derived outcome instruments.
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
A total of 371 patients with a diagnosis of labral tear at our institution were mailed a questionnaire that included the following validated, patient-derived outcome assessment instruments: Short Form 36 (SF-36), European Quality of Life measure (EuroQol), visual analog pain scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and simple shoulder test (SST). Sixty-six surveys did not reach the patients because of incorrect addresses, and 50 surveys were returned, for a 16.4% (50 of 305) response rate. Of the patients with a clinically documented SLAP lesion (positive O'Brien test, pain at the bicipital groove, and positive magnetic resonance imaging) and sufficient follow-up data (minimum 1 year), 39 patients who met the criteria returned the survey and 19 had nonoperative treatment. Twenty patients (51%) from the overall surveyed group were considered nonoperative treatment failures and had arthroscopic surgical reconstruction. Nonoperative treatment consisted of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and a physical therapy protocol focused on scapular stabilization exercises and posterior capsular stretching. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t test; values of P < .05 were considered significant.
At an average follow-up of 3.1 years, function improved significantly (ASES function 30.8 to 45.0 [P < .001]; ASES total 58.5 to 84.7 [P = .001], SST 8.3 to 11.0 [P = .02]) in those patients with successful nonoperative treatment. Quality of life also improved after treatment (EuroQol 0.76 to 0.89, P = .009). Pain relief was significant, as VAS pain scores decreased from 4.5 to 2.1 (P = .043). All patients with successful nonoperative treatment returned to sports. Seventy-one percent of all athletes were able to return to preparticipation levels, but only 66% of overhead athletes returned to their sport at the same or higher level.
Using validated, patient-derived outcome instruments, the present study shows that successful nonoperative treatment of superior labral tears results in improved pain relief and functional outcomes compared with pretreatment assessments. Although 20 patients (51%) in this group elected surgery and may be considered nonoperative treatment failures, those patients with successful nonoperative treatment had significant improvements in pain, function, and quality of life. Return to sports was comparable with patients with successful surgical treatment, although return to overhead sports at the same level was difficult to achieve (66%). Based on these findings, a trial of nonoperative treatment may be considered in patients with the diagnosis of isolated superior labral tear. In overhead athletes and in those patients where pain relief and functional improvement is not achieved, surgical treatment should be considered.
尽管有多项报告记录了手术治疗上盂唇前后部(SLAP)撕裂取得成功的结果,但关于非手术治疗结果的报告却很少。
使用经过验证的、患者自评的结果评估工具,SLAP撕裂的非手术治疗将比治疗前的值带来更好的结果。
病例系列;证据等级,4级。
我们机构共向371例诊断为盂唇撕裂的患者邮寄了一份问卷,其中包括以下经过验证的、患者自评的结果评估工具:简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)、欧洲生活质量量表(EuroQol)、视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)、美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分以及简易肩部测试(SST)。66份调查问卷因地址错误未送达患者,50份调查问卷被退回,回复率为16.4%(305份中的50份)。在有临床记录的SLAP损伤(奥布赖恩试验阳性、二头肌沟疼痛以及磁共振成像阳性)且有足够随访数据(至少1年)的患者中,39例符合标准的患者返回了调查问卷,其中19例接受了非手术治疗。20例(51%)来自整个被调查群体的患者被认为是非手术治疗失败并接受了关节镜手术重建。非手术治疗包括使用非甾体类抗炎药以及一项以肩胛稳定练习和后关节囊拉伸为重点的物理治疗方案。采用配对t检验进行统计分析;P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
在平均3.1年的随访中,成功接受非手术治疗的患者功能有显著改善(ASES功能评分从30.8提高到45.0 [P < 0.001];ASES总分从58.5提高到84.7 [P = 0.001],SST评分从8.3提高到11.0 [P = 0.02])。治疗后生活质量也有所改善(EuroQol评分从0.76提高到0.89,P = 0.009)。疼痛缓解显著,VAS疼痛评分从4.5降至2.1(P = 0.043)。所有成功接受非手术治疗的患者都恢复了运动。所有运动员中有71%能够恢复到参与运动前的水平,但只有66%的过头运动运动员恢复到相同或更高水平的运动。
使用经过验证的、患者自评的结果评估工具,本研究表明,与治疗前评估相比,成功的上盂唇撕裂非手术治疗可带来更好的疼痛缓解和功能结果。尽管该组中有20例(51%)患者选择了手术,可被视为非手术治疗失败,但那些成功接受非手术治疗的患者在疼痛、功能和生活质量方面有显著改善。恢复运动的情况与手术治疗成功的患者相当,尽管恢复到相同水平的过头运动很难实现(66%)。基于这些发现,对于诊断为孤立性上盂唇撕裂的患者可考虑进行非手术治疗试验。对于过头运动运动员以及那些未实现疼痛缓解和功能改善的患者,应考虑手术治疗。