Agnati Luigi F, Guidolin Diego, Albertin Giovanna, Trivello Elena, Ciruela Francisco, Genedani Susanna, Tarakanov Alexander, Fuxe Kjell
IRCCS San Camillo, Lido Venezia, Italy.
J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2010 Oct;30(5):355-69. doi: 10.3109/10799893.2010.487492.
The available evidence for receptor-receptor interactions between adenosine A(2A), dopamine D(2), cannabinoid CB(1), and metabotropic glutamate mGlu(5) receptors (A(2A), D(2), CB(1), and mGlu(5), respectively) is revised under the "receptor mosaic" perspective. Furthermore, the concept of "hub receptor" is defined in accordance with informatics and it is tentatively illustrated in the case of the hypothesized tetramer formed by the above mentioned receptors. On the basis of some biochemical features of the four receptors and of a bioinformatics analysis, an objective deduction of their "similarity" has been obtained. To this aim the Canberra, Euclidean and Chebyshev multivariate distance metrics have been used. It is interesting to note that A(2A) and D(2) are the most different ones, while CB(1) and mGlu(5) are the most similar ones among the four receptors analyzed. Finally, by means of a bioinformatics analysis based on different approaches the possible binding sites mediating G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) interactions have been indicated. It is interesting to note that in some instances accordance has been found between the bioinformatics indications and the available experimental data.
在“受体镶嵌”的视角下,对腺苷A(2A)、多巴胺D(2)、大麻素CB(1)和代谢型谷氨酸mGlu(5)受体(分别为A(2A)、D(2)、CB(1)和mGlu(5))之间的受体 - 受体相互作用的现有证据进行了修订。此外,根据信息学定义了“枢纽受体”的概念,并以由上述受体形成的假设四聚体为例进行了初步说明。基于这四种受体的一些生化特征和生物信息学分析,得出了它们“相似性”的客观推论。为此,使用了堪培拉、欧几里得和切比雪夫多元距离度量。值得注意的是,在所分析的四种受体中,A(2A)和D(2)是差异最大的,而CB(1)和mGlu(5)是最相似的。最后,通过基于不同方法的生物信息学分析,指出了介导G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)相互作用的可能结合位点。有趣的是,在某些情况下,生物信息学指示与现有实验数据之间存在一致性。