Yuan Nicole P, Wind Steven, Nichter Mimi, Nichter Mark, Castañeda Heide, Carruth Lauren, Muramoto Myra
Division of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, 1295 North Martin Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
Am J Health Behav. 2010 Sep-Oct;34(5):607-17. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.34.5.10.
To identify types of health influencers in tobacco cessation based on the frequency and characteristics of brief intervention activities.
Longitudinal qualitative interviews were completed with 28 individuals posttraining.
Four individuals were categorized as Rarely Active, 5 as Active With Family and Friends, 9 as Active in the Workplace, and 10 as Proactive in Multiple Settings. Unique motivators, intervention behaviors, and barriers were documented. Some individuals displayed high levels of self-efficacy necessary for expanding the reach of community-based interventions.
Training programs need to address the impact of contextual factors on initiating and sustaining intervention activities.
根据简短干预活动的频率和特征，确定戒烟过程中的健康影响因素类型。
对28名培训后的个体进行了纵向定性访谈。
4人被归类为极少活动型，5人被归类为在家人和朋友中积极活动型，9人被归类为在工作场所积极活动型，10人被归类为在多个场所积极主动型。记录了独特的动机、干预行为和障碍。一些个体表现出了扩大基于社区的干预范围所需的高度自我效能感。
培训项目需要解决背景因素对启动和维持干预活动的影响。
