Brabrand Mikkel, Folkestad Lars, Hallas Peter
Sydvestjysk Sygehus, Esbjerg, Medicinsk Afdeling, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark.
Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 May 31;172(22):1666-8.
Many emergency departments use validated triage tools. It is currently undocumented if such a practice is common in Danish medical admission units (MAU). The current study was conducted in order to clarify this.
Questionnaire survey with data collected from the intern on call at the medical departments of all Danish hospitals listed on sundhed.dk.
We received 87 answers from 60 individual MAUs covered by a total of 83 interns on call. The MAUs had a median of eight beds and 14 admissions a day. An intern was on call 24 hours a day at 95% of the MAUs. At 87% of the MAUs, a doctor was contacted by the admitting physician, while the contact was the responsibility of a nurse in 13% of MAUs. None of the contacted MAUs used a validated triage tool and 95% answered that they triaged on the basis of individual clinical assessment of patients. However, 22% answered that selected groups of patients were routinely assessed by a senior physician.
None of the Danish MAUs uses a validated triage tool to prioritize acutely admitted medical patients.
许多急诊科使用经过验证的分诊工具。目前尚无文献记载这种做法在丹麦医疗入院科室(MAU)是否常见。开展本研究以阐明这一情况。
通过问卷调查收集来自sundhed.dk上列出的所有丹麦医院内科值班实习生的数据。
我们收到了来自60个独立MAU的87份回复,共有83名值班实习生参与。这些MAU的床位中位数为8张,每日入院人数为14人。95%的MAU有实习生全天值班。87%的MAU中,接收患者的医生会联系医生,而在13%的MAU中,联系工作由护士负责。所有被联系的MAU均未使用经过验证的分诊工具,95%的回复称他们根据对患者的个体临床评估进行分诊。然而,22%的回复称某些特定患者群体由主任医师进行常规评估。
丹麦的MAU均未使用经过验证的分诊工具来对急性入院的内科患者进行优先级排序。