Orlandi Richard R, Marple Bradley F
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, 50 North Medical Drive, 3C120, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2010 Jun;43(3):531-7, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2010.02.011.
Fungus has been cited as an etiologic factor (the etiologic factor?) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and a vigorous debate has ensued. Initial reports of in vitro observations promoted fungus as a potential origin of CRS, yet subsequent clinical trials of topical and systemic antifungal treatments have failed to demonstrate meaningful efficacy. More recent laboratory work has cast significant doubt on the universality of the fungal hypothesis by failing to replicate one of its basic science underpinnings. Combined with clinical data about antifungal therapy's ineffectiveness, these findings appear to tip the scales against fungus as the universal etiology of CRS.
真菌已被认为是慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)的一个病因(病因?),随之引发了激烈的争论。最初关于体外观察的报告促使人们认为真菌是CRS的一个潜在病因,但随后局部和全身抗真菌治疗的临床试验未能证明有显著疗效。最近的实验室研究对真菌假说的普遍性提出了重大质疑,因为其未能重现该假说的一项基础科学依据。结合关于抗真菌治疗无效的临床数据,这些发现似乎使天平向不利于真菌作为CRS普遍病因的方向倾斜。