• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用达芬奇手术系统的EndoWrist抓持后缝线损伤。

Suture damage after grasping with EndoWrist of the da Vinci Surgical System.

作者信息

Hirano Yasumitsu, Ishikawa Norihiko, Watanabe Go

机构信息

Department of General and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.

出版信息

Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010 Aug;19(4):203-6. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2010.496951.

DOI:10.3109/13645706.2010.496951
PMID:20528683
Abstract

Robotic surgery using the da Vinci Surgical System promises to extend the capabilities of minimally invasive surgery and many surgical specialties are applying this new technology. With the progress of robotic surgery, we have many opportunities to perform intracorporeal anastomosis and knotting. In these procedures, we use needle drivers, and we sometimes experience collapse of sutures after grasping them due to the lack of tactile feedback. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between the decrease of durability and robotic manipulation and whether a difference in endurance can be observed using different types of robotic instruments or needle drivers for conventional laparoscopic surgery. We held 4-0 mono-filament sutures with three types of EndoWrist: Large Needle Driver (LND), Cadiere Forceps (CF) and Debaky Forceps (DF) of the da Vinci surgical system once or three times and measured the decrease of durability of the suture. The mean tensions of the suture were significantly decreased after robotic manipulation with LND. The mean tension after holding three times with LND was significantly less than that with the CF. During intracorporeal anastomosis and knotting in robotic surgery, it is important to decrease the necessity to hold the suture directly with EndoWrist. If needed, the best EndoWrist to use is CF or DF, but not LND.

摘要

使用达芬奇手术系统的机器人手术有望扩展微创手术的能力,许多外科专业正在应用这项新技术。随着机器人手术的进展,我们有很多机会进行体内吻合和打结。在这些手术过程中,我们使用持针器,有时会因缺乏触觉反馈而在抓取缝线后出现缝线塌陷的情况。在本研究中,我们评估了耐用性降低与机器人操作之间的关系,以及使用不同类型的机器人器械或传统腹腔镜手术用持针器时,是否能观察到耐久性的差异。我们用达芬奇手术系统的三种类型的腕部器械:大型持针器(LND)、卡迪埃钳(CF)和德巴基钳(DF),分别夹持4-0单丝缝线一次或三次,然后测量缝线耐久性的降低情况。用LND进行机器人操作后,缝线的平均张力显著降低。用LND夹持三次后的平均张力明显低于用CF夹持后的平均张力。在机器人手术的体内吻合和打结过程中,减少直接用腕部器械夹持缝线的必要性很重要。如果需要,最好使用的腕部器械是CF或DF,而不是LND。

相似文献

1
Suture damage after grasping with EndoWrist of the da Vinci Surgical System.使用达芬奇手术系统的EndoWrist抓持后缝线损伤。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010 Aug;19(4):203-6. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2010.496951.
2
Diminished suture strength after robotic needle driver manipulation.机器人持针器操作后缝线强度降低。
J Endourol. 2010 Sep;24(9):1509-13. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0573.
3
Robotic skull base surgery via supraorbital keyhole approach: a cadaveric study.经眶上锁孔入路的机器人颅底手术:尸体研究。
Neurosurgery. 2013 Jan;72 Suppl 1:33-8. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318270d9de.
4
Suture damage during robot-assisted vascular surgery: is it an issue?机器人辅助血管手术中的缝线损伤:这是个问题吗?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Dec;17(6):524-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318150e590.
5
Totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty using the Zeus Microwrist Surgical System: an animal study.使用宙斯微腕手术系统进行完全微创机器人辅助无支架肾盂成形术:一项动物研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Feb;40(2):418-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.10.029.
6
[Minimally invasive robotic coronary bypass on the beating heart using da Vinci S system].[使用达芬奇S系统在跳动心脏上进行微创机器人冠状动脉搭桥术]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Apr 15;47(8):570-3.
7
[The da Vinci surgical system in digestive surgery].[达芬奇手术系统在消化外科中的应用]
Rev Med Suisse. 2007 Jun 27;3(117):1622-6.
8
[Future aspect of robotic surgery].[机器人手术的未来展望]
Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 2002 Apr;93(4):57-63.
9
Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems.感觉替代对机器人手术系统缝合操作力的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jan;129(1):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.05.029.
10
Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.标准器械与两种手术机器人系统之间腹腔镜技能操作的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Apr;17(4):574-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8938-z. Epub 2003 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel and efficient surgical knotting technique for high-tension closures.一种用于高张力缝合的新颖且高效的手术打结技术。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(5):375. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6332.
2
Biaxial sensing suture breakage warning system for robotic surgery.用于机器人手术的双轴传感缝线断裂预警系统
Biomed Microdevices. 2019 Jan 10;21(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s10544-018-0357-6.
3
Suture Breakage Warning System for Robotic Surgery.机器人手术缝线断裂预警系统。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Apr;66(4):1165-1171. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2869417. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
4
Tensile strength and failure load of sutures for robotic surgery.机器人手术缝线的拉伸强度和破坏载荷。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3258-3270. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5356-1. Epub 2016 Dec 7.