• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规光疗中婴儿体位对血清胆红素水平的影响。

Effect of infants' position on serum bilirubin level during conventional phototherapy.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2010 Aug;99(8):1131-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01885.x. Epub 2010 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01885.x
PMID:20528799
Abstract

AIM

To compare the decrease in total serum bilirubin (TSB) concentration during conventional phototherapy in infants treated in supine position exclusively versus infants alternated between exposure in supine and prone position every third hour. Moreover, to survey current practice patterns in two Scandinavian countries as far as alternating exposure.

METHODS

A total of 112 infants with non-haemolytic hyperbilirubinaemia, but otherwise healthy, and a gestational age > or =33 weeks were randomized to one of the treatment groups. All infants received phototherapy for 24 h. TSB was measured at start of phototherapy and after 12 and 24 h of treatment. Questionnaires about routines for position changes in infants during phototherapy were sent to all 41 neonatal departments in Denmark and Norway.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in the decrease in TSB were observed between the two treatment groups: at 12 h of therapy, TSB decreased 32% in both groups and at 24 h 49% and 50%, respectively. In two-thirds of Danish and Norwegian departments, the infants were routinely turned during phototherapy, most often every third hours.

CONCLUSION

The decrease in TSB was not significantly associated with positioning of the infant during conventional phototherapy. Alternating exposure is widely practiced in Scandinavia but is unnecessary.

摘要

目的

比较仰卧位常规光疗与每 3 小时仰卧位与俯卧位交替光疗对血清总胆红素(TSB)浓度下降的影响。此外,还调查了两个斯堪的纳维亚国家目前在交替暴露方面的实践模式。

方法

共有 112 名非溶血性高胆红素血症但健康的、胎龄≥33 周的婴儿被随机分配到治疗组之一。所有婴儿均接受 24 小时光疗。在光疗开始时、治疗 12 小时和 24 小时测量 TSB。向丹麦和挪威的所有 41 个新生儿病房发送了关于光疗期间婴儿体位变化常规的问卷。

结果

两组 TSB 下降无统计学差异:治疗 12 小时时,两组 TSB 分别下降 32%,治疗 24 小时时分别下降 49%和 50%。在三分之二的丹麦和挪威病房,婴儿在光疗期间通常会被常规翻身,通常每 3 小时一次。

结论

TSB 的下降与婴儿在常规光疗期间的体位无关。交替暴露在斯堪的纳维亚地区广泛应用,但没有必要。

相似文献

1
Effect of infants' position on serum bilirubin level during conventional phototherapy.常规光疗中婴儿体位对血清胆红素水平的影响。
Acta Paediatr. 2010 Aug;99(8):1131-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01885.x. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
2
Effect of position changing on bilirubin levels during phototherapy.光疗期间体位改变对胆红素水平的影响。
J Perinatol. 2002 Apr-May;22(3):226-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210678.
3
Skin exposure during conventional phototherapy in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial.早产儿传统光疗期间的皮肤暴露:一项随机对照试验。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2004 May-Jun;40(5-6):270-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2004.00362.x.
4
Dose-response relationship of phototherapy for hyperbilirubinemia.光疗治疗高胆红素血症的剂量反应关系。
Pediatrics. 2012 Aug;130(2):e352-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3235. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
5
Double phototherapy in jaundiced term infants with hemolysis.足月溶血性黄疸婴儿的双重光疗
J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Nov;85(11):1176-81.
6
Effect of position of infant during phototherapy in management of hyperbilirubinemia in late preterm and term neonates: a randomized controlled trial.光疗中婴儿体位对晚期早产儿和足月新生儿高胆红素血症管理的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Perinatol. 2013 Oct;33(10):795-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.54. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
7
A chromosomal-effect study of intensive phototherapy versus conventional phototherapy in newborns with jaundice.蓝光强化治疗与传统蓝光治疗对新生儿黄疸的染色体效应研究
Mutat Res. 2009 May 31;676(1-2):17-20. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
8
Rebound hyperbilirubinemia in term infants after phototherapy.足月儿光疗后反弹高胆红素血症。
Saudi Med J. 2002 Nov;23(11):1394-7.
9
Effectiveness of double-surface intensive phototherapy versus single-surface intensive phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.双面强化光疗与单面强化光疗治疗新生儿高胆红素血症的疗效比较
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jan;91(1):50-5.
10
Neonatal jaundice--are we over-treating?新生儿黄疸——我们是否过度治疗了?
Ir Med J. 2010 Jan;103(1):28-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of BiliCocoon phototherapy with overhead phototherapy in hyperbilirubinemic neonates. A randomized clinical trial.蓝光毯光疗与传统蓝光光疗治疗新生儿高胆红素血症的比较:一项随机临床试验
Pediatr Res. 2025 May;97(6):1951-1957. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03692-5. Epub 2024 Nov 3.
2
Periodic change of body position under phototherapy in term and preterm neonates with hyperbilirubinaemia.光疗中足月和早产儿高胆红素血症患儿体位的周期性变化。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD011997. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011997.pub2.
3
Phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia: Unresolved aspects & future directions.
新生儿高胆红素血症的光疗:未解决的问题与未来方向。
Indian J Med Res. 2021 Apr;153(4):409-412. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1628_20.
4
Sixty years of phototherapy for neonatal jaundice - from serendipitous observation to standardized treatment and rescue for millions.60 年来新生儿黄疸的光疗——从偶然观察到为数百万患者提供标准化治疗和抢救。
J Perinatol. 2020 Feb;40(2):180-193. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0439-1. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
5
Double versus single intensive phototherapy with LEDs in treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.采用发光二极管进行双重与单一强化光疗治疗新生儿高胆红素血症
J Perinatol. 2018 Feb;38(2):154-158. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.167. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
6
The impact of hemoglobin on the efficacy of phototherapy in hyperbilirubinemic infants.血红蛋白对高胆红素血症婴儿光疗疗效的影响。
Pediatr Res. 2017 Dec;82(6):947-951. doi: 10.1038/pr.2017.186. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
7
Effect of phototherapy with turquoise vs. blue LED light of equal irradiance in jaundiced neonates.在黄疸新生儿中,同等辐照度的绿松石色与蓝色发光二极管光疗的效果比较。
Pediatr Res. 2016 Feb;79(2):308-12. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.209. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
Early formation of bilirubin isomers during phototherapy for neonatal jaundice: effects of single vs. double fluorescent lamps vs. photodiodes.新生儿黄疸光疗期间胆红素异构体的早期形成:单荧光灯与双荧光灯及光电二极管的效果比较
Pediatr Res. 2015 Jul;78(1):56-62. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.61. Epub 2015 Mar 20.