Bristol School of Anaesthesia, Severn Deanery, Bristol, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2010 Aug;65(8):781-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06390.x. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
A new paediatric Glidescope (Cobalt GVL Stat) has recently become available. This varies in design from the Karl Storz DCI videolaryngoscope, as it possesses a short curved disposable blade compared with the narrower straighter blade of the Storz. We compared the time taken for tracheal intubation under normal and difficult intubation conditions in a paediatric manikin. A total of 32 anaesthetists completed four intubations in a random order, with each participant blinded to the airway condition. We hypothesised there would be no difference between the devices. The results showed no difference in tracheal intubation time between the Glidescope and the Storz videolaryngoscope. The mean (SD) times under normal conditions were 18.8 (5.2) s vs 19.9 (6.1) s, (p = 0.16), respectively. Under difficult conditions the times were 22.6 (10.5) vs 27.0 (14.2) s, (p = 0.13), respectively. There were no differences in the visual analogue scores for field of view, ease of use, willingness to use in an emergency, and overall satisfaction.
一种新的儿科 Glidescope(Cobalt GVL Stat)最近推出。它的设计与 Karl Storz DCI 视频喉镜不同,因为它具有一个短而弯曲的一次性刀片,而 Storz 的刀片则更窄更直。我们比较了在儿科模拟模型中正常和困难插管条件下气管插管所需的时间。共有 32 名麻醉师以随机顺序完成了 4 次插管,每个参与者对气道状况均不知情。我们假设两种设备之间不会有差异。结果显示,Glidescope 和 Storz 视频喉镜在气管插管时间上没有差异。正常条件下的平均(SD)时间分别为 18.8(5.2)s 和 19.9(6.1)s(p=0.16)。在困难条件下,时间分别为 22.6(10.5)s 和 27.0(14.2)s(p=0.13)。在视野、易用性、在紧急情况下使用的意愿以及总体满意度方面,视觉模拟评分没有差异。