• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简约中文版吸烟自我效能调查(CSSES-20)的心理测量学特征。

Psychometric characteristics of the parsimonious Chinese version of the Smoking Self-Efficacy Survey (CSSES-20).

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, 65 Bergen Street, PO Box 1709, Newark, NJ 07101-1709, USA.

出版信息

J Sch Health. 2010 May;80(5):259-64; quiz 265-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00497.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00497.x
PMID:20529199
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cigarette smoking is a health-risk behavior of global proportions. Self-efficacy plays an important role in both smoking acquisition and smoking resistance. Reliability and validity of an instrument is fundamental to research results, particularly in its simplified form on a different population. The purpose of this study was to conduct psychometric testing on the parsimonious Chinese version of the Smoking Self-efficacy Survey (CSSES-20).

METHODS

The randomized cluster sample was drawn from 61 middle schools in Taipei City, Taiwan. Following a pilot test of the CSSES-20, the CSSES was administered to 571 adolescents. Construct validity was tested by the exploratory factor procedures and the contrasted group approach. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the criterion validity and test-retest reliability for the stability of the scale. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were used to determine the internal consistency of the scale.

RESULTS

The exploratory factor analysis yields three components, "opportunity to smoke,""emotional stress," and "influence of friends," accounting for 80.4% of the total variances. The criterion validity was also supported by the study results. The contrasted group approaches affirmed the construct validity of the CSSES-20. Stability of scales was supported by test-retest reliability. Cronbach's alphas for 3 subscales ranged from .90 to .93.

CONCLUSIONS

A concise instrument can alleviate response burden for adolescent study participants and increase their recruitment and retention rates. The CSSES-20 demonstrated satisfactory construct validity, criterion validity, stability, and internal consistency reliability. These findings can be used to provide school teachers and nurses with information about the relationship between self-efficacy to resist smoking and adolescent smoking behavior.

摘要

背景

吸烟是一种全球性的健康风险行为。自我效能感在吸烟的获得和抵制中都起着重要作用。工具的可靠性和有效性是研究结果的基础,尤其是在针对不同人群的简化形式上。本研究旨在对简化版的中文版吸烟自我效能感量表(CSSES-20)进行心理测量学测试。

方法

该随机整群样本来自中国台湾台北市的 61 所中学。在对 CSSES-20 进行试点测试后,对 571 名青少年进行了 CSSES 测试。通过探索性因素程序和对比组方法来检验结构有效性。使用皮尔逊相关系数来检验效标效度和量表的稳定性的重测信度。使用 Cronbach's alpha 系数来确定量表的内部一致性。

结果

探索性因素分析得出三个成分,“吸烟机会”、“情绪压力”和“朋友影响”,占总方差的 80.4%。研究结果也支持效标效度。对比组方法肯定了 CSSES-20 的结构有效性。量表的稳定性得到重测信度的支持。3 个子量表的 Cronbach's alpha 值范围在.90 到.93 之间。

结论

一个简洁的工具可以减轻青少年研究参与者的反应负担,提高他们的招募和保留率。CSSES-20 表现出令人满意的结构有效性、效标效度、稳定性和内部一致性信度。这些发现可用于向学校教师和护士提供有关抵制吸烟的自我效能感与青少年吸烟行为之间关系的信息。

相似文献

1
Psychometric characteristics of the parsimonious Chinese version of the Smoking Self-Efficacy Survey (CSSES-20).简约中文版吸烟自我效能调查(CSSES-20)的心理测量学特征。
J Sch Health. 2010 May;80(5):259-64; quiz 265-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00497.x.
2
Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Decisional Balance Scale (CDBS).中文版决策平衡量表(CDBS)的心理测量测试。
Health Educ Behav. 2006 Dec;33(6):812-20. doi: 10.1177/1090198105282411. Epub 2006 May 31.
3
Development and validation of the Chinese version of the Diabetes Management Self-efficacy Scale.中文版糖尿病管理自我效能量表的编制与验证
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Apr;45(4):534-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.020. Epub 2006 Oct 19.
4
Validation of the Chinese version of the satisfaction with the nursing home instrument.中文版养老院护理满意度量表的效度验证。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Dec;15(12):1574-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01507.x.
5
Developing a valid and reliable Self-Efficacy in Clinical Performance scale.开发一个有效且可靠的临床操作自我效能感量表。
Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Jun;56(2):214-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00685.x.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Mainland Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.中文版爱丁堡产后抑郁量表的心理测量学评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jun;46(6):813-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.010. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
7
Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of nursing practice environment scale.护理实践环境量表中文版的心理测量学测试。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Mar;18(6):919-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02433.x. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
8
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
9
Psychometric validation of a condom self-efficacy scale in Korean.韩国避孕套自我效能量表的心理测量学验证
Nurs Res. 2008 Jul-Aug;57(4):245-51. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000313492.02530.d2.
10
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Health Belief Model Scale in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者中健康信念模型量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Nov;44(8):1447-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.06.004. Epub 2007 Jul 25.