• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赞成与反对:州法院诉讼无法成功推翻个人强制参保令。

Pro & con. State lawsuits won't succeed in overturning the individual mandate.

机构信息

Washington and Lee University School of Law, Lexington, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1225-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0404.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0404
PMID:20530360
Abstract

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 looks to the states to implement its insurance regulatory reforms and exchanges, retaining for the national government what could be construed as merely a backup role. The law offers federal support to the states, along with opportunities to act creatively to meet residents' needs. It thus is unfortunate that a number of states have responded by challenging the law, both legislatively and judicially, rather than getting on with implementation. These challenges have no legal merit and are a serious distraction from the real work that lies before the states.

摘要

2010 年的《患者保护与平价医疗法案》指望各州实施其保险监管改革和交易所,将本可以被解释为仅仅是后备角色的职责保留给联邦政府。该法律为各州提供了联邦支持,同时也为满足居民需求提供了创造性行动的机会。因此,令人遗憾的是,一些州选择通过立法和司法手段对该法律提出质疑,而不是着手实施,这是没有法律依据的,并且严重分散了各州面前的真正工作。

相似文献

1
Pro & con. State lawsuits won't succeed in overturning the individual mandate.赞成与反对:州法院诉讼无法成功推翻个人强制参保令。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1225-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0404.
2
Pro & con. State suits against health reform are well grounded in law--and pose serious challenges.正反观点。州政府对医改提起的诉讼在法律上有充分依据,并对医改构成严重挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1229-33. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0449.
3
The war isn't over.战争还没有结束。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1259-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1003394. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
4
In the wake of the verdict: the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the federal health law leaves lawmakers working out what it means for their states.裁决之后:美国最高法院对联邦医疗保健法的裁决让立法者们琢磨这对他们的州意味着什么。
State Legis. 2012 Jul-Aug;38(7):46-7.
5
From Massachusetts to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: aboard the health reform express.从马萨诸塞州到宾夕法尼亚大道 1600 号:登上医疗改革专列。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1106-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0429.
6
Health care reform in perspective.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 15;361(16):e30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0909384.
7
Clearing out the underbrush in constitutional challenges to health insurance reform.清除对医疗保险改革的宪法挑战中的障碍。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):793-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1101252. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
8
New roles for states in health reform implementation.国家在医改实施中的新角色。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1178-82. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0448.
9
The constitutionality of the ACA's Medicaid-expansion mandate.《平价医疗法案》中医疗补助扩大指令的合宪性。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):103-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1113416. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
10
The ghost that slayed the mandate.斩杀授权的幽灵。
Stanford Law Rev. 2012 Jan;64(1):55-88.

引用本文的文献

1
COBRA ARRA subsidies: was the carrot enticing enough?COBRA ARRA 补贴:胡萝卜是否足够诱人?
Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct;47(5):1980-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01409.x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.