Department of Languages, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, Agora 40014, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Jun;53(3):710-24. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0133).
To examine the ability to discriminate phonemic length and the association of this ability with reading accuracy, reading speed, and spelling accuracy in Finnish children throughout Grades 1-3.
Reading-disabled (RDFR, n = 35) and typically reading children (TRFR, n = 69) with family risk for dyslexia and typically reading control children (TRC, n = 80) were tested once in each grade of Grades 1-3 using a phonemic length discrimination task. Reading, spelling, IQ, verbal short-term memory, phonological memory, and naming speed were assessed.
The RDFR group made more errors in phonemic length discrimination than the TRC group in Grades 2 and 3. After taking into account variance in verbal short-term memory, phonological memory, and naming speed, discrimination ability explained unique variance of spelling accuracy in Grades 2 and 3 and reading accuracy in Grade 3 in the RDFR group. At the individual level, in Grade 2, 31.4% of the RDFR group and 14.7% of the TRFR group performed below -1.25 SDs in the phonemic length discrimination task.
Problems in phonemic length discrimination could be one of the accumulating risk factors affecting development leading to dyslexia.
研究芬兰儿童在 1 至 3 年级期间辨别语音长度的能力,以及这种能力与阅读准确性、阅读速度和拼写准确性的关系。
使用语音长度辨别任务,对阅读障碍(RDFR)儿童(n = 35)、有阅读障碍家族风险的典型阅读(TRFR)儿童(n = 69)和典型阅读控制(TRC)儿童(n = 80)进行测试,每个年级各进行一次。评估了阅读、拼写、智商、言语短期记忆、语音记忆和命名速度。
RDFR 组在 2 年级和 3 年级的语音长度辨别任务中比 TRC 组犯的错误更多。在考虑了言语短期记忆、语音记忆和命名速度的差异后,辨别能力在 2 年级和 3 年级解释了 RDFR 组拼写准确性和 3 年级阅读准确性的独特差异。在个体水平上,在 2 年级,RDFR 组的 31.4%和 TRFR 组的 14.7%在语音长度辨别任务中表现低于-1.25 SD。
语音长度辨别能力存在问题可能是导致阅读障碍的累积风险因素之一。