Department of Pharmacy Services, Foothills Medical Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Jul-Aug;44(7-8):1158-63. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M745. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
Based on case reports in infants, the safety of concomitant use of ceftriaxone and intravenous calcium in all ages has recently come under challenge. Systematic population-based data to guide clinicians with respect to this risk are, however, lacking.
To determine whether concomitant administration of ceftriaxone and intravenous calcium was associated with the occurrence of severe cardiorespiratory events or death in critically ill adults.
We performed a matched-cohort study from retrospective data of adults admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in Calgary, Canada, who were provided continuous high-dose intravenous calcium. Those who received ceftriaxone while on continuous renal replacement therapy were considered exposed. Up to 3 unexposed patients were selected by matching on a number of prognostic factors from the remaining subjects not concurrently exposed to ceftriaxone and calcium. Univariate methods and multivariate conditional logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.
We identified 142 patients exposed to the implicated combination who could be matched to at least one unexposed patient. Hospital mortality was 66% in the exposed versus 63% in unexposed patients (p = 0.442). ICU length of stay, ICU mortality, hospital length of stay, and the frequency of acute oxygenation events were all similar by univariate analysis. Multivariate conditional logistic regression modeling failed to find a significant association between exposure and hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.04) or other relevant outcomes.
In this high-risk group, administration of high concentrations of calcium and concurrent ceftriaxone was not significantly associated with greater mortality or adverse outcomes compared to matched unexposed patients. Although this was an underpowered study and rare adverse effects from the interaction of these 2 compounds cannot be completely excluded, these data provide overall reassurance of the safety of this combination in the majority of critically ill adults.
基于婴儿病例报告,最近人们对所有年龄段同时使用头孢曲松和静脉钙的安全性提出了质疑。然而,缺乏系统的基于人群的数据来指导临床医生应对这一风险。
确定在危重症成人中,同时给予头孢曲松和静脉钙是否与严重心肺事件或死亡的发生相关。
我们进行了一项匹配队列研究,从加拿大卡尔加里的重症监护病房(ICU)住院成人的回顾性数据中提取,这些患者接受了持续高剂量静脉钙治疗。在接受连续肾脏替代治疗的同时接受头孢曲松治疗的患者被认为是暴露组。从其余未同时暴露于头孢曲松和钙的患者中,根据多个预后因素选择最多 3 名未暴露组患者进行匹配。采用单变量方法和多变量条件逻辑回归进行统计分析。
我们确定了 142 名接受该组合治疗的暴露患者,可以与至少一名未暴露患者相匹配。暴露组的医院死亡率为 66%,而未暴露组为 63%(p = 0.442)。单变量分析显示,ICU 住院时间、ICU 死亡率、医院住院时间和急性氧合事件的频率均相似。多变量条件逻辑回归模型未发现暴露与医院死亡率(调整后的 OR 1.15,95%CI 0.65 至 2.04)或其他相关结局之间存在显著关联。
在这个高危人群中,与匹配的未暴露患者相比,给予高浓度钙和同时给予头孢曲松与死亡率或不良结局增加无关。尽管这是一项研究效力不足的研究,不能完全排除这两种化合物相互作用的罕见不良影响,但这些数据总体上为大多数危重症成人使用这种组合的安全性提供了保证。