Subtil Fabien, Rabilloud Muriel
Université de Lyon, France.
Biom J. 2010 Jun;52(3):333-47. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200900242.
The objective of this study was to develop methods to estimate the optimal threshold of a longitudinal biomarker and its credible interval when the diagnostic test is based on a criterion that reflects a dynamic progression of that biomarker. Two methods are proposed: one parametric and one non-parametric. In both the cases, the Bayesian inference was used to derive the posterior distribution of the optimal threshold from which an estimate and a credible interval could be obtained. A numerical study shows that the bias of the parametric method is low and the coverage probability of the credible interval close to the nominal value, with a small coverage asymmetry in some cases. This is also true for the non-parametric method in case of large sample sizes. Both the methods were applied to estimate the optimal prostate-specific antigen nadir value to diagnose prostate cancer recurrence after a high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment. The parametric method can also be applied to non-longitudinal biomarkers.
本研究的目的是开发一些方法,用于估计纵向生物标志物的最佳阈值及其可信区间,前提是诊断测试基于反映该生物标志物动态进展的标准。提出了两种方法:一种是参数法,一种是非参数法。在这两种情况下,均使用贝叶斯推断来推导最佳阈值的后验分布,从中可以获得估计值和可信区间。一项数值研究表明,参数法的偏差较小,可信区间的覆盖概率接近名义值,在某些情况下覆盖不对称性较小。在大样本量的情况下,非参数法也是如此。这两种方法都被用于估计高强度聚焦超声治疗后诊断前列腺癌复发的最佳前列腺特异性抗原最低点值。参数法也可应用于非纵向生物标志物。