• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Double-blind comparison of two types of benzocaine lozenges for the treatment of acute pharyngitis.

作者信息

Busch Regina, Graubaum Hans-Joachim, Grünwald Jörg, Schmidt Mathias

机构信息

Analyze & Realize AG, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 2010;60(5):245-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296280.

DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1296280
PMID:20533760
Abstract

In a reference-controlled double-blind trial in patients with acute pharyngitis the effects of a newly developed lozenge containing 8 mg of benzocaine (p-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester, CAS 94-09-7) were compared with those of an identically dosed commercial pastille. 246 patients were randomized to receive either the lozenges (group A, n = 123) or the pastilles (group B, n = 123). Each patient took a total of six doses within 12 h according to the double-dummy principle, with each single dose spaced by 2 h. The primary parameter was the assessment of the responder rate with = 50 % pain relief within 15 min post application. Further parameters included the relative relief of pain in the course of the study and the tolerability of the formulation. After application of the first unit the comparison of groups yielded very similar and statistically not differing results for efficacy in both groups, with responder rates of 25.2 % and 22.0 % in groups A and B, respectively. One adverse drug reaction was observed in group B (burning and tingling feeling on the tongue), which, however, did not lead to discontinuation of study participation. In all other cases tolerability was stated to be "good to very good". The application of the benzocaine lozenges was statistically non-inferior to the use of the pastilles.

摘要

相似文献

1
Double-blind comparison of two types of benzocaine lozenges for the treatment of acute pharyngitis.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2010;60(5):245-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296280.
2
Efficacy and safety of a triple active sore throat lozenge in the treatment of patients with acute pharyngitis: Results of a multi-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial (DoriPha).一种三联活性咽喉含片治疗急性咽炎患者的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、平行组试验(DoriPha)的结果
Int J Clin Pract. 2018 Dec;72(12):e13272. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13272. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
3
Lidocaine 8 mg sore throat lozenges in the treatment of acute pharyngitis. A new therapeutic option investigated in comparison to placebo treatment.8毫克利多卡因咽喉含片治疗急性咽炎。与安慰剂治疗相比的一种新治疗选择研究。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2007;57(11):689-97. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296669.
4
Local anaesthetic properties of ambroxol hydrochloride lozenges in view of sore throat. Clinical proof of concept.盐酸氨溴索含片针对咽喉痛的局部麻醉特性。临床概念验证。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2002;52(3):194-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299879.
5
Efficacy of a benzocaine lozenge in the treatment of uncomplicated sore throat.苯佐卡因含片治疗单纯性咽痛的疗效。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Feb;269(2):571-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1802-9. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
6
Efficacy of 8 mg lidocaine and 2 mg cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) fixed-combination lozenges on sore throat pain intensity compared with 1 mg lidocaine and 2 mg CPC fixed-combination lozenges in subjects with sore throat due to upper respiratory tract infection: a randomized double-blind parallel-group single-dose study.与1毫克利多卡因和2毫克氯化十六烷基吡啶(CPC)固定组合含片相比,8毫克利多卡因和2毫克氯化十六烷基吡啶(CPC)固定组合含片对上呼吸道感染所致喉咙痛患者喉咙痛疼痛强度的疗效:一项随机双盲平行组单剂量研究。
Trials. 2018 Dec 12;19(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3077-6.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of ambroxol hydrochloride lozenges in sore throat. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials regarding the local anaesthetic properties.盐酸氨溴索含片治疗咽喉痛的疗效及耐受性。关于局部麻醉特性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2002;52(4):256-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299889.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of an intraoral benzocaine patch in the relief of spontaneous toothache pain.口腔用苯佐卡因贴片缓解自发性牙痛的疗效及耐受性
J Clin Dent. 2003;14(1):1-6.
9
Ectoine lozenges in the treatment of acute viral pharyngitis: a prospective, active-controlled clinical study.依克多因含片治疗急性病毒性咽炎:一项前瞻性、活性对照临床研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;276(3):775-783. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05324-9. Epub 2019 Feb 9.
10
A study of benzocaine gel dosing for toothache.一项关于用于治疗牙痛的苯佐卡因凝胶剂量的研究。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(4):103-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of a triple active sore throat lozenge in the treatment of patients with acute pharyngitis: Results of a multi-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial (DoriPha).一种三联活性咽喉含片治疗急性咽炎患者的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、平行组试验(DoriPha)的结果
Int J Clin Pract. 2018 Dec;72(12):e13272. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13272. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
2
Efficacy of a benzocaine lozenge in the treatment of uncomplicated sore throat.苯佐卡因含片治疗单纯性咽痛的疗效。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Feb;269(2):571-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1802-9. Epub 2011 Oct 21.