Suppr超能文献

起源研究的历史发展。

Historical development of origins research.

机构信息

Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 70-407, Cd. Universitaria, 04510 México DF, Mexico.

出版信息

Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010 Nov;2(11):a002089. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002089. Epub 2010 Jun 9.

Abstract

Following the publication of the Origin of Species in 1859, many naturalists adopted the idea that living organisms were the historical outcome of gradual transformation of lifeless matter. These views soon merged with the developments of biochemistry and cell biology and led to proposals in which the origin of protoplasm was equated with the origin of life. The heterotrophic origin of life proposed by Oparin and Haldane in the 1920s was part of this tradition, which Oparin enriched by transforming the discussion of the emergence of the first cells into a workable multidisciplinary research program. On the other hand, the scientific trend toward understanding biological phenomena at the molecular level led authors like Troland, Muller, and others to propose that single molecules or viruses represented primordial living systems. The contrast between these opposing views on the origin of life represents not only contrasting views of the nature of life itself, but also major ideological discussions that reached a surprising intensity in the years following Stanley Miller's seminal result which showed the ease with which organic compounds of biochemical significance could be synthesized under putative primitive conditions. In fact, during the years following the Miller experiment, attempts to understand the origin of life were strongly influenced by research on DNA replication and protein biosynthesis, and, in socio-political terms, by the atmosphere created by Cold War tensions. The catalytic versatility of RNA molecules clearly merits a critical reappraisal of Muller's viewpoint. However, the discovery of ribozymes does not imply that autocatalytic nucleic acid molecules ready to be used as primordial genes were floating in the primitive oceans, or that the RNA world emerged completely assembled from simple precursors present in the prebiotic soup. The evidence supporting the presence of a wide range of organic molecules on the primitive Earth, including membrane-forming compounds, suggests that the evolution of membrane-bounded molecular systems preceded cellular life on our planet, and that life is the evolutionary outcome of a process, not of a single, fortuitous event.

摘要

1859 年《物种起源》出版后,许多自然学家接受了这样一种观点,即生物是无生命物质逐渐转化的历史产物。这些观点很快与生物化学和细胞生物学的发展融合在一起,并导致了这样的提议,即原生质的起源等同于生命的起源。奥巴林和霍尔丹在 20 世纪 20 年代提出的异养生命起源就是这一传统的一部分,奥巴林通过将第一个细胞的出现的讨论转变为一个可行的多学科研究计划,丰富了这一传统。另一方面,科学趋势是在分子水平上理解生物现象,这导致了像特罗兰、穆勒等人提出的观点,即单个分子或病毒代表原始的生命系统。这两种对立的生命起源观点之间的对比不仅代表了对生命本身本质的不同看法,而且还代表了在斯坦利·米勒的开创性结果之后的几年中达到惊人强度的主要思想讨论,该结果表明在假定的原始条件下,生物化学意义上的有机化合物很容易合成。事实上,在米勒实验之后的几年里,对生命起源的理解受到了 DNA 复制和蛋白质生物合成研究的强烈影响,从社会政治角度来看,受到冷战紧张局势造成的氛围的影响。RNA 分子的催化多功能性显然值得对穆勒的观点进行批判性重新评估。然而,核酶的发现并不意味着能够自我催化的核酸分子准备好作为原始基因在原始海洋中漂浮,或者 RNA 世界完全由前生物汤中存在的简单前体组装而成。支持原始地球上存在广泛的有机分子的证据,包括形成膜的化合物,表明膜结合分子系统的进化先于我们星球上的细胞生命,并且生命是一个过程的进化结果,而不是单一的、偶然的事件。

相似文献

1
Historical development of origins research.起源研究的历史发展。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010 Nov;2(11):a002089. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002089. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
6
The origins of research into the origins of life.关于生命起源的研究的起源。
Endeavour. 2006 Mar;30(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Feb 22.
7
Alexandr Oparin and the origin of life on Earth.
Riv Biol. 2009 Jan-Apr;102(1):95-118.
8
In search of a primitive signaling code.寻找一种原始信号编码。
Biosystems. 2019 Sep;183:103984. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2019.103984. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
9
Prebiotic chemistry in clouds.云层中的益生元化学。
J Mol Evol. 1991;32:296-303. doi: 10.1007/BF02102187.
10
Darwin's warm little pond revisited: from molecules to the origin of life.重温达尔文的温暖小池塘:从分子到生命起源
Naturwissenschaften. 2009 Nov;96(11):1265-92. doi: 10.1007/s00114-009-0602-1. Epub 2009 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

3
10
The requirement of cellularity for abiogenesis.无生源说对细胞构成的要求。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021 Apr 17;19:2202-2212. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.030. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The gene.该基因。
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1947 Jan 7;134(874):1-37. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1947.0001.
2
Darwin and the origin of life: public versus private science.达尔文与生命起源:公众科学与私人科学
Endeavour. 2009 Dec;33(4):148-51. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2009.09.008. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
3
Charles Darwin and the origin of life.
Orig Life Evol Biosph. 2009 Oct;39(5):395-406. doi: 10.1007/s11084-009-9172-7. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
4
The Miller volcanic spark discharge experiment.米勒火山火花放电实验。
Science. 2008 Oct 17;322(5900):404. doi: 10.1126/science.1161527.
7
A reassessment of prebiotic organic synthesis in neutral planetary atmospheres.对中性行星大气中益生元有机合成的重新评估。
Orig Life Evol Biosph. 2008 Apr;38(2):105-15. doi: 10.1007/s11084-007-9120-3. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
8
A NEW THEORY OF THE ORIGIN AND NATURE OF LIFE.生命起源与本质的新理论
Science. 1942 Jul 3;96(2479):14. doi: 10.1126/science.96.2479.14.
9
On the Early Chemical History of the Earth and the Origin of Life.论地球早期化学史与生命起源
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1952 Apr;38(4):351-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.38.4.351.
10
The origins of research into the origins of life.关于生命起源的研究的起源。
Endeavour. 2006 Mar;30(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Feb 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验