Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7120, USA.
Genet Med. 2010 Aug;12(8):486-95. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181e38f9e.
Sharing study data within the research community generates tension between two important goods: promoting scientific goals and protecting the privacy interests of study participants. This study was designed to explore the perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes of research participants and possible future participants regarding genome-wide association studies and repository-based research.
Focus group sessions with (1) current research participants, (2) surrogate decision-makers, and (3) three age-defined cohorts (18-34 years, 35-50, >50).
Participants expressed a variety of opinions about the acceptability of wide sharing of genetic and phenotypic information for research purposes through large, publicly accessible data repositories. Most believed that making de-identified study data available to the research community is a social good that should be pursued. Privacy and confidentiality concerns were common, although they would not necessarily preclude participation. Many participants voiced reservations about sharing data with for-profit organizations.
Trust is central in participants' views regarding data sharing. Further research is needed to develop governance models that enact the values of stewardship.
在研究社区内共享研究数据,在促进科学目标和保护研究参与者的隐私利益这两个重要目标之间产生了紧张关系。本研究旨在探讨研究参与者和可能的未来参与者对全基因组关联研究和基于存储库的研究的看法、信念和态度。
采用焦点小组会议的形式,召集了(1)当前的研究参与者,(2)替代决策人,以及(3)三个年龄定义的队列(18-34 岁、35-50 岁、>50 岁)。
参与者对通过大型、公开可访问的数据存储库广泛共享遗传和表型信息用于研究目的的可接受性表达了各种意见。大多数人认为,向研究界提供去识别的研究数据是一种社会公益,应该加以追求。隐私和保密问题虽然普遍存在,但不一定会排除参与。许多参与者对与营利性组织共享数据表示保留意见。
信任是参与者对数据共享看法的核心。需要进一步研究制定治理模式,以体现管理的价值观。