Jamal Leila, Sapp Julie C, Lewis Katie, Yanes Tatiane, Facio Flavia M, Biesecker Leslie G, Biesecker Barbara B
1] Department of Neurogenetics, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA [2] Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Genetic Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Aug;22(8):964-8. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.276. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
Respecting the confidentiality of personal data contributed to genomic studies is an important issue for researchers using genomic sequencing in humans. Although most studies adhere to rules of confidentiality, there are different conceptions of confidentiality and why it is important. The resulting ambiguity obscures what is at stake when making tradeoffs between data protection and other goals in research, such as transparency, reciprocity, and public benefit. Few studies have examined why participants in genomic research care about how their information is used. To explore this topic, we conducted semi-structured phone interviews with 30 participants in two National Institutes of Health research protocols using genomic sequencing. Our results show that research participants value confidentiality as a form of control over information about themselves. To the individuals we interviewed, control was valued as a safeguard against discrimination in a climate of uncertainty about future uses of individual genome data. Attitudes towards data sharing were related to the goals of research and details of participants' personal lives. Expectations of confidentiality, trust in researchers, and a desire to advance science were common reasons for willingness to share identifiable data with investigators. Nearly, all participants were comfortable sharing personal data that had been de-identified. These findings suggest that views about confidentiality and data sharing are highly nuanced and are related to the perceived benefits of joining a research study.
对于在人类基因组研究中使用基因组测序的研究人员来说,尊重贡献给基因组研究的个人数据的保密性是一个重要问题。尽管大多数研究都遵守保密规则,但对于保密性及其重要性的理解却各不相同。这种模糊性掩盖了在数据保护与研究中的其他目标(如透明度、互惠性和公共利益)之间进行权衡时的利害关系。很少有研究探讨为什么基因组研究的参与者关心他们的信息是如何被使用的。为了探讨这个话题,我们对参与美国国立卫生研究院两项使用基因组测序的研究方案的30名参与者进行了半结构化电话访谈。我们的结果表明,研究参与者重视保密性,将其视为对自己信息的一种控制权。对于我们采访的个体而言,在个体基因组数据未来用途存在不确定性的情况下,控制权被视为防止歧视的一种保障。对数据共享的态度与研究目标以及参与者个人生活细节有关。对保密性的期望、对研究人员的信任以及推进科学的愿望是愿意与研究人员分享可识别数据的常见原因。几乎所有参与者都愿意分享已去识别化的个人数据。这些发现表明,关于保密性和数据共享的观点非常微妙,并且与参与研究的感知益处相关。