Suppr超能文献

与术前穿刺活检相比,根治性前列腺切除标本中Gleason评分的升级:一项印度的经验。

Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: an Indian experience.

作者信息

Nayyar Rishi, Singh Prabhjot, Gupta Narmada P, Hemal Ashok K, Dogra Prem N, Seth Amlesh, Kumar Rajeev

机构信息

Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029, India.

出版信息

Indian J Urol. 2010 Jan-Mar;26(1):56-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.60445.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the accuracy of Gleason grading/scoring on preoperative needle core biopsy (NCB) compared to the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of NCB and RP specimens was analyzed in 193 cases. Gleason grade/scoring was done on both NCB and RP specimens. Sixteen cases were excluded for various reasons. The Gleason scores of the two sets of matched specimens were compared and also correlated with the PSA, age, and number of needle biopsy cores. The overall change was also correlated with the initial score on NCB.

RESULTS

The mean age and PSA were 63.3+/-2(5.27) years and 18.48+/-2(28.42) ng/ml, respectively. The average Gleason score increased from 5.51 +/- 2(1.52) to 6.2 +/- 2(1.42) (P<0.02). The primary grade increased in 57 (32.2%) cases. Overall, 97 (54.8%) cases had an increase in Gleason score. Five other cases had a change from 3 + 4 = 7 to 4 + 3 = 7. Change in Gleason score was significantly more if the score on NCB was </=6 or number of needle cores was </=6. Besides, 28 cases had perineural invasion, 16 had capsular invasion (pT3(a)), and 4 had vascular invasion on RP specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant upgrading of Gleason score on RP specimens when compared with NCB. This trend may be correlated positively with lower initial Gleason score on preoperative biopsy and the lower number of cores taken.

摘要

目的

评估术前穿刺活检(NCB)与根治性前列腺切除术(RP)标本相比时Gleason分级/评分的准确性。

材料与方法

分析193例患者的NCB和RP标本数据。对NCB和RP标本均进行Gleason分级/评分。16例因各种原因被排除。比较两组匹配标本的Gleason评分,并与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、年龄和穿刺活检针数相关联。总体变化也与NCB的初始评分相关。

结果

平均年龄和PSA分别为63.3±2(5.27)岁和18.48±2(28.42)ng/ml。平均Gleason评分从5.51±2(1.52)增加到6.2±2(1.42)(P<0.02)。57例(32.2%)主要分级增加。总体而言,97例(54.8%)Gleason评分增加。另外5例从3+4=7变为4+3=7。如果NCB评分≤6或穿刺针数≤6,Gleason评分变化显著更大。此外,28例在RP标本上有神经周围侵犯,16例有包膜侵犯(pT3(a)),4例有血管侵犯。

结论

与NCB相比,RP标本的Gleason评分有显著上调。这种趋势可能与术前活检时较低的初始Gleason评分和较少的穿刺针数呈正相关。

相似文献

4
Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings.
Am J Surg Pathol. 1997 May;21(5):566-76. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199705000-00010.
5
Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.014.
8
Significance of small foci of Gleason score 7 or greater prostate cancer on needle biopsy.
Urology. 1999 Sep;54(3):528-32. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00166-1.
10
Postoperative upgrading of prostate cancer in men ≥75 years: a propensity score-matched analysis.
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1517-1524. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2045-1. Epub 2017 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Serum Calcium Level at Diagnosis Can Predict Lethal Prostate Cancer Relapse.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 16;13(16):4845. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164845.
2
CXC Chemokine/Receptor Axis Profile and Metastasis in Prostate Cancer.
Front Mol Biosci. 2020 Oct 15;7:579874. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.579874. eCollection 2020.
4
Does true Gleason pattern 3 merit its cancer descriptor?
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Sep;13(9):541-8. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.141. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.
Pathol Oncol Res. 2016 Apr;22(2):349-56. doi: 10.1007/s12253-015-0013-x. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
6
Clinicopathological study of prostatic biopsies.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Sep;8(9):FC04-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8591.4843. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
10
Authors' reply.
Indian J Urol. 2010 Jul;26(3):463.

本文引用的文献

4
Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Urology. 2005 Aug;66(2):356-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.002.
5
Prostate biopsy volume indices do not predict for significant Gleason upgrading.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr;28(2):125-9. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000143848.24158.c3.
6
Trends in reporting Gleason score 1991 to 2001: changes in the pathologist's practice.
Eur Urol. 2005 Feb;47(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.029.
7
Increased accuracy of biopsy Gleason score obtained by extended needle biopsy.
J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2224-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000144456.67352.63.
10
Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验