• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与术前穿刺活检相比,根治性前列腺切除标本中Gleason评分的升级:一项印度的经验。

Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: an Indian experience.

作者信息

Nayyar Rishi, Singh Prabhjot, Gupta Narmada P, Hemal Ashok K, Dogra Prem N, Seth Amlesh, Kumar Rajeev

机构信息

Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029, India.

出版信息

Indian J Urol. 2010 Jan-Mar;26(1):56-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.60445.

DOI:10.4103/0970-1591.60445
PMID:20535286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2878439/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the accuracy of Gleason grading/scoring on preoperative needle core biopsy (NCB) compared to the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of NCB and RP specimens was analyzed in 193 cases. Gleason grade/scoring was done on both NCB and RP specimens. Sixteen cases were excluded for various reasons. The Gleason scores of the two sets of matched specimens were compared and also correlated with the PSA, age, and number of needle biopsy cores. The overall change was also correlated with the initial score on NCB.

RESULTS

The mean age and PSA were 63.3+/-2(5.27) years and 18.48+/-2(28.42) ng/ml, respectively. The average Gleason score increased from 5.51 +/- 2(1.52) to 6.2 +/- 2(1.42) (P<0.02). The primary grade increased in 57 (32.2%) cases. Overall, 97 (54.8%) cases had an increase in Gleason score. Five other cases had a change from 3 + 4 = 7 to 4 + 3 = 7. Change in Gleason score was significantly more if the score on NCB was </=6 or number of needle cores was </=6. Besides, 28 cases had perineural invasion, 16 had capsular invasion (pT3(a)), and 4 had vascular invasion on RP specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant upgrading of Gleason score on RP specimens when compared with NCB. This trend may be correlated positively with lower initial Gleason score on preoperative biopsy and the lower number of cores taken.

摘要

目的

评估术前穿刺活检(NCB)与根治性前列腺切除术(RP)标本相比时Gleason分级/评分的准确性。

材料与方法

分析193例患者的NCB和RP标本数据。对NCB和RP标本均进行Gleason分级/评分。16例因各种原因被排除。比较两组匹配标本的Gleason评分,并与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、年龄和穿刺活检针数相关联。总体变化也与NCB的初始评分相关。

结果

平均年龄和PSA分别为63.3±2(5.27)岁和18.48±2(28.42)ng/ml。平均Gleason评分从5.51±2(1.52)增加到6.2±2(1.42)(P<0.02)。57例(32.2%)主要分级增加。总体而言,97例(54.8%)Gleason评分增加。另外5例从3+4=7变为4+3=7。如果NCB评分≤6或穿刺针数≤6,Gleason评分变化显著更大。此外,28例在RP标本上有神经周围侵犯,16例有包膜侵犯(pT3(a)),4例有血管侵犯。

结论

与NCB相比,RP标本的Gleason评分有显著上调。这种趋势可能与术前活检时较低的初始Gleason评分和较少的穿刺针数呈正相关。

相似文献

1
Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: an Indian experience.与术前穿刺活检相比,根治性前列腺切除标本中Gleason评分的升级:一项印度的经验。
Indian J Urol. 2010 Jan-Mar;26(1):56-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.60445.
2
Discrepancies in Gleason score between needle core biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens with correlation between clinical and pathological staging.前列腺穿刺活检与根治性前列腺切除术标本中 Gleason 评分的差异与临床病理分期的相关性。
Urologia. 2024 Aug;91(3):518-524. doi: 10.1177/03915603241244942. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
3
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.前列腺腺癌,核心穿刺活检 Gleason 评分 9-10:与根治性前列腺切除术的相关性及预后。
J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2068-73. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.056. Epub 2013 May 30.
4
Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings.学术与社区环境下前列腺穿刺活检与前列腺根治性切除标本Gleason分级的相关性
Am J Surg Pathol. 1997 May;21(5):566-76. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199705000-00010.
5
Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.扩展前列腺活检方案提高了 Gleason 分级的可靠性:对放疗患者的影响
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.014.
6
The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.前列腺穿刺活检标本中癌阳性核心的百分比强烈预测根治性前列腺切除术中的肿瘤分期和体积。
J Urol. 2000 Jan;163(1):174-8.
7
The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度预测初始前列腺活检和前列腺切除术中 Gleason 评分升级的能力随着肿瘤分级的增加而降低,这是由于单位肿瘤体积的 PSA 分泌减少所致。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10681.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
8
Significance of small foci of Gleason score 7 or greater prostate cancer on needle biopsy.穿刺活检中Gleason评分7分及以上前列腺癌小病灶的意义
Urology. 1999 Sep;54(3):528-32. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00166-1.
9
Correlation of Gleason scores between needle-core biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer.前列腺癌患者穿刺活检与前列腺根治性切除标本中Gleason评分的相关性
J Chin Med Assoc. 2005 Apr;68(4):167-71. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70243-6.
10
Postoperative upgrading of prostate cancer in men ≥75 years: a propensity score-matched analysis.男性年龄≥75 岁的前列腺癌术后升级:倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1517-1524. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2045-1. Epub 2017 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Serum Calcium Level at Diagnosis Can Predict Lethal Prostate Cancer Relapse.诊断时的血清钙水平可预测致命性前列腺癌复发。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 16;13(16):4845. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164845.
2
CXC Chemokine/Receptor Axis Profile and Metastasis in Prostate Cancer.CXC趋化因子/受体轴概况与前列腺癌转移
Front Mol Biosci. 2020 Oct 15;7:579874. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.579874. eCollection 2020.
3
Interrelationship Between Health Insurance Status and Prostate Cancer Grade Can Have Critical Impact on Prostate Cancer Disease Control: A Retrospective Cohort Study.健康保险状况与前列腺癌分级之间的相互关系对前列腺癌疾病控制可能产生关键影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Control. 2019 Jan-Dec;26(1):1073274819837184. doi: 10.1177/1073274819837184.
4
Does true Gleason pattern 3 merit its cancer descriptor?真正的 Gleason 模式 3 是否值得使用癌症描述符?
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Sep;13(9):541-8. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.141. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.准确测定Gleason评分对前列腺癌治疗方案及预后的意义
Pathol Oncol Res. 2016 Apr;22(2):349-56. doi: 10.1007/s12253-015-0013-x. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
6
Clinicopathological study of prostatic biopsies.前列腺活检的临床病理研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Sep;8(9):FC04-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8591.4843. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
7
Clinical and pathological variables that predict changes in tumour grade after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.预测前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后肿瘤分级变化的临床和病理变量。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Jan-Feb;7(1-2):E93-7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.270.
8
Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle core biopsies: a comparison of general and urologic pathologists.针芯活检中前列腺癌的Gleason分级:普通病理学家与泌尿外科病理学家的比较
Ann Saudi Med. 2013 Jan-Feb;33(1):40-4. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.40.
9
Retropubic radical prostatectomy: Clinicopathological observations and outcome analysis of 428 consecutive patients.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术:428例连续患者的临床病理观察与结果分析
Indian J Urol. 2011 Jul;27(3):337-44. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.85437.
10
Authors' reply.作者回复。
Indian J Urol. 2010 Jul;26(3):463.

本文引用的文献

1
Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.活检组织条数量是低风险前列腺癌患者临床显著 Gleason 评分升级的最重要预测因素之一。
Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1087-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.048. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
2
Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.通过增加经直肠活检针芯数量提高预测前列腺癌Gleason评分的准确性。
Urol Int. 2007;79(4):302-6. doi: 10.1159/000109713.
3
Prostate cancers scored as Gleason 6 on prostate biopsy are frequently Gleason 7 tumors at radical prostatectomy: implication on outcome.前列腺穿刺活检 Gleason 评分为 6 分的前列腺癌在根治性前列腺切除术中常为 Gleason 7 级肿瘤:对预后的影响。
J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):979-84; discussion 984. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.102.
4
Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy.饱和活检在预测根治性前列腺切除术中微小癌方面的效用。
Urology. 2005 Aug;66(2):356-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.002.
5
Prostate biopsy volume indices do not predict for significant Gleason upgrading.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr;28(2):125-9. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000143848.24158.c3.
6
Trends in reporting Gleason score 1991 to 2001: changes in the pathologist's practice.
Eur Urol. 2005 Feb;47(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.029.
7
Increased accuracy of biopsy Gleason score obtained by extended needle biopsy.通过延长穿刺活检获得的活检Gleason评分准确性提高。
J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2224-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000144456.67352.63.
8
Preoperative prediction of Gleason grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: the influence of different Gleason grades from multiple positive biopsy sites.根治性前列腺切除标本中Gleason分级的术前预测:多个阳性活检部位不同Gleason分级的影响
Mod Pathol. 2005 Feb;18(2):228-34. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800302.
9
Limitations of biopsy Gleason grade: implications for counseling patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer.活检 Gleason 分级的局限性:对活检 Gleason 评分 6 分前列腺癌患者咨询的影响
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):98-102. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132135.18093.d6.
10
Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.扩展前列腺活检方案提高了 Gleason 分级的可靠性:对放疗患者的影响
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.014.