• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肋缘下小切口:供肾切除术的一个不错选择。

Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010 May;65(5):507-10. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322010000500008.

DOI:10.1590/S1807-59322010000500008
PMID:20535369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2882545/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We describe the results of over one hundred nephrectomies performed using a subcostal mini incision.

INTRODUCTION

A major effort has been undertaken to encourage living donor renal transplantation. New techniques that use minimally invasive approaches to perform donor nephrectomy have been progressively accepted. Among these new procedures is the mini-incision approach.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed one hundred and seventeen consecutive donors that were subjected to subcostal mini-incision nephrectomy at a single center. Surgical time, warm and cold ischemia time, intraoperative complications, time until hospital discharge, presence of infection, bleeding, the need for a second operation, and death were analyzed. Eventual loss of donor renal function was indicated by increases in serum creatinine and proteinuria.

RESULTS

The mean time of surgery was 180.5 +/- 26.2 minutes. The mean warm ischemia time was 93 +/-8.3 seconds, while the mean cold ischemia time was 85.9 (+/-23.5) minutes. We had one case with an intraoperative complication, and only two patients required another operation. An intra-abdominal abscess occurred in one patient (0.85%), proteinuria occurred in one patient (0.85%), and a transitory increase of creatinine levels occurred in two patients (1.7%).

DISCUSSION

Reducing the length of the abdominal incision did not influence surgical time or result in an increase in intraoperative complications relative to our historical data or literature reports. Organ preparation was accomplished successfully with a brief warm ischemia time. Additionally, the mean hospital stay was short, and few surgical complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

The use of a subcostal mini incision is both safe and similar to conventional techniques previously described in the literature.

摘要

目的

我们描述了使用肋缘下小切口进行的一百多次肾切除术的结果。

引言

为鼓励活体供肾移植,我们做出了巨大的努力。使用微创方法进行供肾切除术的新技术已经逐渐被接受。这些新程序中包括小切口方法。

方法

我们在一个中心前瞻性地分析了 117 例连续接受肋缘下小切口肾切除术的供者。分析了手术时间、热缺血和冷缺血时间、术中并发症、住院时间、感染、出血、需要再次手术以及死亡的情况。供体肾功能丧失最终表现为血清肌酐和蛋白尿升高。

结果

手术时间平均为 180.5+/-26.2 分钟。平均热缺血时间为 93+/-8.3 秒,平均冷缺血时间为 85.9+/-23.5 分钟。我们有 1 例术中并发症,仅 2 例需要再次手术。1 例患者发生腹腔脓肿(0.85%),1 例患者出现蛋白尿(0.85%),2 例患者肌酐水平短暂升高(1.7%)。

讨论

与我们的历史数据或文献报告相比,减少腹部切口长度并未影响手术时间或导致术中并发症增加。通过短暂的热缺血时间成功完成了器官准备。此外,平均住院时间较短,手术并发症较少。

结论

使用肋缘下小切口既安全又与文献中先前描述的常规技术相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec5d/2882545/9710fced0fd1/cln_65p507f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec5d/2882545/0e11d0b0e9d1/cln_65p507f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec5d/2882545/9710fced0fd1/cln_65p507f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec5d/2882545/0e11d0b0e9d1/cln_65p507f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec5d/2882545/9710fced0fd1/cln_65p507f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy.肋缘下小切口:供肾切除术的一个不错选择。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010 May;65(5):507-10. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322010000500008.
2
Mini-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in living-donor kidney transplantation: A retrospective cohort study.微创切口与手助腹腔镜供肾切取术在活体供肾移植中的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:339-344. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
3
Mini-incision for strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy in living kidney donation vs flank incision.活体肾移植中采用微型切口行严格后腹腔镜肾切除术与侧腹切口的比较。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Oct;21(10):2948-52. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl158. Epub 2006 Aug 5.
4
Inguinal oblique incision as an alternative route to extract the kidney during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.腹股沟斜切口作为腹腔镜供肾肾切除术时摘取肾脏的替代路径。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2011 Oct;9(5):315-8.
5
Hand-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal donor nephrectomy: A single-institution experience of over 500 cases-Operative technique and clinical outcomes.手助腹腔镜后腹腔镜供肾切除术:500 多例单中心经验-手术技术和临床结果。
Clin Transplant. 2018 Jun;32(6):e13261. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13261. Epub 2018 May 12.
6
A fast and safe living donor "finger-assisted" nephrectomy technique: results of 359 cases.一种快速安全的活体供体“手指辅助”肾切除术技术:359例手术结果
Transplant Proc. 2010 Jan-Feb;42(1):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.12.042.
7
Results in laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a multicentric experience.腹腔镜活体供肾切除术的结果:多中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2013;45(10):3716-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.08.089.
8
Reproducibility and Step-By-Step Learning Curve of Retroperitoneal Video-Assisted Mini-Laparotomy Surgery for Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-Center Experience.后腹腔镜辅助小切口活体供肾切取术的可重复性和分步学习曲线:单中心经验。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2022 Jul;20(7):657-662. doi: 10.6002/ect.2022.0086.
9
Mini-incision donor nephrectomy techniques: a systematic review.微创供体肾切除术技术:一项系统评价
Exp Clin Transplant. 2010 Sep;8(3):189-95.
10
Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: endo TA stapler is safe and effective.腹腔镜右供体肾切除术:内镜TA缝合器安全有效。
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2010 May;21(3):421-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Registry of Hospital das Clínicas of the University of São Paulo Medical School: first official solid organ and tissue transplantation report - 2008.圣保罗大学医学院临床医院登记处:2008年首次官方实体器官和组织移植报告。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(2):127-34. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000200010.
2
Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy.三种不同活体供肾切除术方法的比较与前瞻性分析。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(1):23-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000100005.
3
A comparison of hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomy.
活体供肾肾切除术的手辅助与单纯腹腔镜技术比较。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Dec;63(6):795-800. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322008000600015.
4
Mini-incisions by lombotomy or subcostal access in living kidney donors: a randomized trial comparing pain, safety, and quality of life.活体肾供体经腰部或肋下切口的小切口手术:一项比较疼痛、安全性和生活质量的随机试验。
Clin Transplant. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(2):269-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00638.x.
5
Laparoscopic vs open living donor nephrectomy: a contemporary series from one centre.腹腔镜与开放活体供肾肾切除术:来自一个中心的当代系列研究
BJU Int. 2006 Jul;98(1):133-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06265.x.
6
Risks and benefits to the living donor.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 4;353(5):447-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058156.
7
Laparoscopic versus open living-donor nephrectomy: experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety.腹腔镜与开放活体供肾肾切除术:一项关注供体安全性的前瞻性、随机、单中心研究的经验
Transplantation. 2005 May 15;79(9):1236-40. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000161669.49416.ba.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放性供肾切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2005 Apr;95(6):851-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05415.x.
9
Laparoscopic nephrectomy in live donor.
Int Braz J Urol. 2004 Jan-Feb;30(1):22-8. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382004000100005.
10
Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: UK experience.
BJU Int. 2005 Jan;95(1):131-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05264.x.