Research Unit 04/UR/08-20, Tahar Sfar University Hospital, Mahdia, Tunisia.
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 15;51(2):143-9. doi: 10.1086/653527.
BACKGROUND. Although the use of antibiotics in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is largely accepted, controversy remains regarding whether the choice of antibiotic has any impact on outcome. Our aim was to compare the effects of the combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin in patients treated for severe COPD exacerbation requiring mechanical ventilation. METHODS. In a randomized, double-blind trial, we included 170 patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD requiring mechanical ventilation. Enrolled patients received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (n = 85) or ciprofloxacin (n = 85) for 10 days. Main outcomes were hospital death and need for an additional course of antibiotics. Secondary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and exacerbation-free interval. RESULTS. Combined hospital death and additional antibiotic prescription rates were similar in the 2 groups (16.4% vs 15.3% for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group vs ciprofloxacin group; difference, 1.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -9.8% to 12.0%; P = .832). Hospital death occurred in 7 patients (8.2%) receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and 8 patients (9.4%) receiving ciprofloxacin (difference, -1.2%; 95% CI, -9.7 to 7.3; P = .90). The need for an additional antibiotic course was observed in 8 patients in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group and 5 patients in the ciprofloxacin group (difference, 2.3%; 95% CI, -5.4 to 10.0; P = .549). The mean exacerbation-free interval (+/- standard deviation) was similar in both treatment groups (83 +/- 25 vs 79 +/- 22 for the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group vs ciprofloxacin group; difference, 4 days; 95% CI, -15 to 19 days; P = .41). Duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay was not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS. In patients with acute exacerbation of COPD requiring mechanical ventilation, efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was not inferior to ciprofloxacin. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00791505.
虽然抗生素在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期的治疗中得到广泛应用,但抗生素的选择是否会影响疗效仍存在争议。我们的目的是比较复方磺胺甲噁唑和环丙沙星治疗需要机械通气的重度 COPD 急性加重患者的效果。
在一项随机、双盲试验中,我们纳入了 170 例需要机械通气的 COPD 急性加重患者。入组患者接受复方磺胺甲噁唑(n=85)或环丙沙星(n=85)治疗 10 天。主要结局是住院死亡和需要额外使用抗生素。次要结局是机械通气时间、住院时间和无加重间隔。
两组联合住院死亡和额外使用抗生素的发生率相似(复方磺胺甲噁唑组为 16.4%,环丙沙星组为 15.3%;差异,1.1%;95%置信区间[CI]为-9.8%至 12.0%;P=0.832)。住院死亡发生在 7 例(8.2%)接受复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗的患者和 8 例(9.4%)接受环丙沙星治疗的患者(差异,-1.2%;95%CI,-9.7 至 7.3;P=0.90)。需要额外使用抗生素的患者在复方磺胺甲噁唑组有 8 例,环丙沙星组有 5 例(差异,2.3%;95%CI,-5.4 至 10.0;P=0.549)。两组的无加重间隔(均值±标准差)相似(复方磺胺甲噁唑组为 83±25,环丙沙星组为 79±22;差异,4 天;95%CI,-15 至 19 天;P=0.41)。两组机械通气时间和住院时间无显著差异。
在需要机械通气的 COPD 急性加重患者中,复方磺胺甲噁唑的疗效并不劣于环丙沙星。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00791505。