Radiofrequency thermal ablation versus 'cold steel' for supra-auricular excision of preauricular sinus: comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results of radiofrequency thermal ablation versus 'cold steel' excision, for supra-auricular excision of preauricular sinus.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study. Observations included recurrence, intra-operative bleeding, operation time and ease of dissection.

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospital.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Sixty cases of preauricular sinus were assigned randomly to two groups (30 cases each). Group one patients underwent cold steel sinus excision, whereas group two patients underwent radiofrequency-assisted sinus excision.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were operated upon, with a mean age of 12.26 years. Most patients were aged between zero and five years (40 per cent). The average patient follow-up time was 15 months (range, six to 24 months). Recurrence rates were 23 per cent in group one and 3 per cent in group two; this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.016). Dissection of the sinus tract was reported to be much easier in the radiofrequency group, compared with the cold steel group (p = 0.023), with minimal bleeding.

CONCLUSION

From our observations, radiofrequency-assisted, local, wide excision appears to be preferable for treatment of preauricular sinus, compared with cold steel excision, as it allows better peri-operative visualisation, easier dissection, minimal bleeding and a lower subsequent recurrence rate (3.3 per cent).