Cunningham E R, Satava R
General Surgery Service, USAF Regional Hospital, Maxwell AFB, Alabama 36112.
Am Surg. 1991 Apr;57(4):271-3.
In view of the current incorporation of gastrointestinal endoscopy within surgical residency programs and therefore increased performance of these procedures by surgeons, it is appropriate to devise an effective database which allows retrieval of pertinent information for quality assurance (QA) and utilization review (UR) programs. During the development of two complete surgical endoscopy teaching programs, the QA process has been extensively analyzed for the minimal essential information required to perform QA in compliance with regulations of JCAHO and other reviewing authorities. Over the previous five years this information has been gathered on 3098 patients and incorporated into a database which allows for review of the medical record and the endoscopy unit record for QA and UR. Although the data were entered into a computerized database program for ease of data retrieval and analysis, this information can be complied by the "stubby pencil" method in paper files or log books. The QA process is integrated as part of the general surgery QA, not under a separate endoscopy committee. Results demonstrate that the minimal essential data for the medical record included: patient identification data, endoscopist, procedure, additional procedures, medications, indications, preoperative diagnosis, description of procedure, findings, tissue obtained, complications, final diagnosis, and discharge planning. The endoscopy unit record contained: patient identification, endoscopist, procedure, tissue obtained, and suite complications. From these data elements, complete QA was performed and included: completeness of documentation, appropriate indications, complications, endoscopic versus pathologic diagnosis, and unsuccessful procedures. Utilization review included: number of normal procedures, benefits of screening and surveillance procedures, and appropriateness of preoperative evaluation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
鉴于目前胃肠内镜检查已纳入外科住院医师培训项目,外科医生实施这些操作的机会因此增加,设计一个有效的数据库以检索相关信息用于质量保证(QA)和利用审查(UR)项目是合适的。在制定两个完整的外科内镜教学项目过程中,已对QA流程进行了广泛分析,以确定按照联合委员会国际部(JCAHO)和其他审查机构的规定进行QA所需的最低基本信息。在过去五年中,已收集了3098例患者的这些信息,并将其纳入一个数据库,该数据库可用于审查病历和内镜室记录以进行QA和UR。尽管为便于数据检索和分析而将数据录入计算机数据库程序,但这些信息也可以用纸质文件或日志中的“铅笔记录”方法整理。QA流程作为普通外科QA的一部分进行整合,而非隶属于一个单独的内镜委员会。结果表明,病历的最低基本数据包括:患者识别数据、内镜检查医生、操作、附加操作、用药、适应证、术前诊断、操作描述、检查结果、获取的组织、并发症、最终诊断和出院计划。内镜室记录包含:患者识别、内镜检查医生、操作、获取的组织和检查室并发症。根据这些数据元素进行了完整的QA,包括:文件记录的完整性、适应证是否恰当、并发症、内镜诊断与病理诊断的对比以及未成功的操作。利用审查包括:正常操作的数量、筛查和监测操作的益处以及术前评估的适当性。(摘要截选至250词)