Jonasson Sofia, Hedenstierna Göran, Hjoberg Josephine
Dept. of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology, University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Aug;109(2):521-31. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01317.2009. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
Glucocorticoids (GC) remain the first choice of treatment in asthma, but GC therapy is not always effective and is associated with side effects. In a porcine study in our laboratory, simultaneous administration of GC and nitric oxide (NO) attenuated the endotoxin-induced inflammatory response and made GC treatment more effective than inhaled NO or steroids alone. In the present study, we aimed to further investigate the interactions between NO and GC treatment in two murine models of asthma. Inflammation was induced by endotoxin, ovalbumin, or a combination of both. With an animal ventilator and a forced oscillation method (FlexiVent), lung mechanics and airway reactivity to methacholine in response to various treatments were assessed. We also describe histology and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) protein expression in response to inhaled NO treatment [40 ppm NO gas or NO donors sodium nitroprusside (SNP) or diethylamine NONOate (DEA/NO)]. SNP and GC provided protection against bronchoconstriction to a similar degree in the model of severe asthma. When GC-treated mice were given SNP, maximum airway reactivity was further reduced. Similar effects were seen after DEA/NO delivery to GC-treated animals. Using 1-H-[1,2,4]-oxadiazolo-[4,3-a]-quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), a soluble guanylate cyclase inhibitor, we found this effect of NO donors to be mediated through a cGMP-independent mechanism. In the severe model, prolonged NO treatment restored or even increased the nuclear levels of GR. In conclusion, in our murine model of severe asthma GC treatment provided protection to only a limited degree against bronchoconstriction, while concomitant treatment with a NO donor was markedly more potent than the use of either NO or GC alone.
糖皮质激素(GC)仍是哮喘治疗的首选药物,但GC治疗并非总是有效,且会产生副作用。在我们实验室的一项猪研究中,同时给予GC和一氧化氮(NO)可减轻内毒素诱导的炎症反应,使GC治疗比单独吸入NO或类固醇更有效。在本研究中,我们旨在进一步研究在两种哮喘小鼠模型中NO与GC治疗之间的相互作用。通过内毒素、卵清蛋白或两者结合诱导炎症。使用动物呼吸机和强迫振荡法(FlexiVent),评估了各种治疗后肺力学和气道对乙酰甲胆碱的反应性。我们还描述了吸入NO治疗[40 ppm NO气体或NO供体硝普钠(SNP)或二乙胺NONOate(DEA/NO)]后的组织学和糖皮质激素受体(GR)蛋白表达。在严重哮喘模型中,SNP和GC对支气管收缩的保护程度相似。当给GC治疗的小鼠给予SNP时,最大气道反应性进一步降低。将DEA/NO给予GC治疗的动物后也观察到类似效果。使用可溶性鸟苷酸环化酶抑制剂1-H-[1,2,4]-恶二唑并-[4,3-a]-喹喔啉-1-酮(ODQ),我们发现NO供体的这种作用是通过非cGMP依赖机制介导的。在严重模型中,延长NO治疗可恢复甚至增加GR的核水平。总之,在我们的严重哮喘小鼠模型中,GC治疗对支气管收缩的保护作用有限,而与NO供体联合治疗明显比单独使用NO或GC更有效。