• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估患者群体在欧盟委员会共同资助的健康项目中的参与情况:Value+项目的经验。

Assessing the involvement of the patient community in European commission co-funded health projects: the experience of the value+ project.

作者信息

Sanna Liuska

机构信息

European Patients' Forum, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jul-Sep;33(3):265-71. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e5eb7b.

DOI:10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e5eb7b
PMID:20539154
Abstract

Strengthening patients' meaningful involvement enhances the results of health-related projects and contributes toward patient-centered, equitable health care across the European Union (EU). Although current EU health policy reflects this premise, a concerted strategy to achieve patient involvement is, however, missing. European Patients' Forum-led Value+ project has represented in this respect the first effort ever made to produce an overarching EU-wide analysis of current practices and trends regarding patient involvement in EU health-related projects. Through the extensive use of qualitative, case-based research methods and effective exchange of experiences among key stakeholders, Value+ made an effective contribution to raising awareness about this important issue.

摘要

加强患者的有意义参与可提高与健康相关项目的成果,并有助于在整个欧盟实现以患者为中心的公平医疗保健。尽管当前的欧盟卫生政策体现了这一前提,但实现患者参与的协调战略却付诸阙如。在这方面,由欧洲患者论坛牵头的“价值+”项目是首次对欧盟范围内患者参与与健康相关项目的当前做法和趋势进行全面分析的尝试。通过广泛运用定性的、基于案例的研究方法以及关键利益相关者之间的有效经验交流,“价值+”项目为提高对这一重要问题的认识做出了有效贡献。

相似文献

1
Assessing the involvement of the patient community in European commission co-funded health projects: the experience of the value+ project.评估患者群体在欧盟委员会共同资助的健康项目中的参与情况:Value+项目的经验。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jul-Sep;33(3):265-71. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e5eb7b.
2
Difficulties of tracing health research funded by the European Union.欧盟资助的健康研究追踪困难。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010 Jul;15(3):133-6. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.009115. Epub 2010 May 13.
3
The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy.患者参与医疗保健咨询的意义:一种分类法。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Mar;64(6):1297-310. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
4
Cross-border health activities in the Euregios: good practice for better health.欧洲区域的跨境卫生活动:促进健康的良好实践。
Health Policy. 2008 May;86(2-3):245-54. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.10.015. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
5
The emerging mental health strategy of the European Union: a multi-level work-in-progress.欧盟新兴的心理健康战略:一项多层次的进行中的工作。
Health Policy. 2008 Jan;85(1):60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
6
Factors influencing health care-seeking behaviours among Mayan women in Guatemala.影响危地马拉玛雅妇女就医行为的因素。
Midwifery. 2009 Aug;25(4):411-21. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.07.011. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
7
Chronic kidney disease in the United States: a public policy imperative.美国的慢性肾脏病:一项公共政策要务。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Nov;3(6):1902-10. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02330508. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
8
Addressing the socioeconomic determinants of adolescent health: experiences from the WHO/HBSC Forum 2007.应对青少年健康的社会经济决定因素:2007年世界卫生组织/健康行为与学校卫生调查论坛的经验
Int J Public Health. 2009 Sep;54 Suppl 2:278-84. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-5420-x.
9
Local health policy development processes in the Netherlands: an expanded toolbox for health promotion.荷兰地方卫生政策制定流程:促进健康的扩展工具箱
Health Promot Int. 2007 Jun;22(2):112-21. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam009. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
10
Chinese villages and their sustainable future: the European Union-China-Research Project "SUCCESS".中国乡村及其可持续未来:欧盟-中国研究项目“SUCCESS”
J Environ Manage. 2008 Apr;87(2):204-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
2
Scaling up strategies of the chronic respiratory disease programme of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (Action Plan B3: Area 5).扩大欧洲积极健康老龄化创新伙伴关系慢性呼吸疾病项目的战略(行动计划B3:领域5)。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2016 Jul 29;6:29. doi: 10.1186/s13601-016-0116-9. eCollection 2016.
3
'Practical' resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review.
支持患者及家属参与医疗决策的“实用”资源:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 15;14:175. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-175.