Kawabara Hiromichi
Jinho Law Office.
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2010 May;111(3):139-42.
Surgeons have a greater risk of facing medical malpractice lawsuits than internists. Surgeons have therefore become increasingly aware of this possibility from the standpoint of risk management. The most frequently encountered judicial disputes in surgical malpractice claims include: 1) surgical indications; 2) surgical procedures; 3) postsurgical management; and 4) presurgical explanations. In the fourth issue, possible discrepancies between the cognizance of the surgeon and the judge should be carefully noted, in which case the decisions of the Supreme Court should be used as a reference. Regardless of judicial disputes, thorough explanations in the aftermath of intra- or postoperative events are always warranted. A medical malpractice trial is a protracted process. The physician defendant will likely shoulder much of the psychological burden during a trial, although he or she is not engaged in a dispute solely for personal reasons. A physician involved in a malpractice lawsuit should not be left to traverse the path alone.
外科医生比内科医生面临医疗事故诉讼的风险更大。因此,从风险管理的角度来看,外科医生越来越意识到这种可能性。外科医疗事故索赔中最常遇到的司法纠纷包括:1)手术适应症;2)手术程序;3)术后管理;4)术前解释。在第四个问题中,应仔细注意外科医生和法官认知之间可能存在的差异,在这种情况下,应以最高法院的裁决为参考。无论司法纠纷如何,术后或术后事件发生后都应进行充分解释。医疗事故审判是一个漫长的过程。尽管被告医生并非仅仅出于个人原因卷入纠纷,但在审判期间可能会承担很大一部分心理负担。卷入医疗事故诉讼的医生不应独自面对这一过程。