Suppr超能文献

进一步基于人群的腹主动脉瘤筛查的荟萃分析。

A further meta-analysis of population-based screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):1103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.283. Epub 2010 Jun 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

It remains unclear whether population-based screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men reduces all-cause long-term mortality. We performed an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of AAA screening for prevention of long-term mortality in men.

METHODS

To identify all randomized controlled trials of population-based AAA screening with long-term (≥ 10 year) follow-up in men, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through June 2009. Data regarding AAA-related and all-cause mortality (including Cox regression hazard ratios [HRs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were abstracted from each individual study. For each study, data regarding mortality in both the screening and control groups were used to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Study-specific estimates were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic ORs or HRs (or risk ratios where no HR was reported) in both fixed- and random-effects models.

RESULTS

Our search identified four randomized controlled trials of population-based AAA screening with long-term follow-up in men aged ≥ 65 years. Pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in AAA-related mortality (random-effects OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.86; P = .008; P for heterogeneity = .01; absolute risk reduction [ARR], 4 per 1000; number needed to screen [NNS], 238; random-effects HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.86; P = .009; P for heterogeneity = .009) and revealed a statistically nonsignificant reduction (but a strong trend toward a significant reduction) in all-cause mortality (fixed-effects OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.00 [1.001]; P = .06; P for heterogeneity = .93; ARR, 5 per 1000; NNS, 217; fixed-effects HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.00 [1.0001]; P ≥ .05 [P = .052]; P for heterogeneity = .74) with AAA screening relative to control.

CONCLUSION

The results of our analysis suggest that population-based screening for AAA reduces AAA-related long-term mortality by 4 per 1000 over control in men aged ≥ 65 years. Whereas, screening for AAA shows a strong trend toward a significant reduction in all-cause long-term mortality by 5 per 1000, which does not narrowly reach statistical significance.

摘要

目的

人群为基础的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查是否能降低男性全因长期死亡率仍不清楚。我们对 AAA 筛查预防男性长期死亡率的随机对照试验进行了更新的荟萃分析。

方法

为了确定所有以人群为基础的 AAA 筛查的随机对照试验,这些试验具有男性的长期(≥10 年)随访,通过 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库,检索到 2009 年 6 月的资料。从每一项研究中提取与 AAA 相关和全因死亡率的数据(包括 Cox 回归风险比[HR]和 95%置信区间[CI])。对于每一项研究,使用筛查组和对照组的死亡率数据,生成比值比(OR)和 95%CI。在固定效应和随机效应模型中,使用对数 OR 或 HR(或无 HR 报道时的风险比)的逆方差加权平均值,对研究特异性估计值进行合并。

结果

我们的搜索确定了四项以人群为基础的 AAA 筛查的随机对照试验,这些试验具有≥65 岁男性的长期随访。汇总分析显示,与对照组相比,AAA 相关死亡率显著降低(随机效应 OR,0.55;95%CI,0.36 至 0.86;P=0.008;P 异质性=0.01;绝对风险降低[ARR],每 1000 人减少 4 例;每筛查 238 人减少 1 例;随机效应 HR,0.55;95%CI,0.35 至 0.86;P=0.009;P 异质性=0.009),全因死亡率也呈现出统计学上无显著降低(但有显著降低的趋势)(固定效应 OR,0.98;95%CI,0.95 至 1.00[1.001];P=0.06;P 异质性=0.93;ARR,每 1000 人减少 5 例;每筛查 217 人减少 1 例;固定效应 HR,0.98;95%CI,0.96 至 1.00[1.0001];P≥0.05[P=0.052];P 异质性=0.74)。

结论

我们的分析结果表明,与对照组相比,人群为基础的 AAA 筛查可使≥65 岁男性的 AAA 相关长期死亡率每 1000 人降低 4 例。虽然,AAA 筛查在全因长期死亡率方面显示出显著降低的强烈趋势,每 1000 人降低 5 例,但没有达到统计学上的显著意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验