Suppr超能文献

儿童花生过敏的口服花生免疫治疗。

Oral peanut immunotherapy in children with peanut anaphylaxis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology, University Hospital Charité, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Jul;126(1):83-91.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.04.030. Epub 2010 Jun 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The only treatment option for peanut allergy is strict avoidance.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy (OIT) in peanut allergy.

METHODS

Twenty-three children (age, 3.2-14.3 years) with IgE-mediated peanut allergy confirmed by positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) received OIT following a rush protocol with roasted peanut for 7 days. If a protective dose of at least 0.5 g peanut was not achieved, patients continued with a long-term buildup protocol using biweekly dose increases up to at least 0.5 g peanut. A maintenance phase for 8 weeks was followed by 2 weeks of peanut avoidance and a final DBPCFC. Immunologic parameters were determined.

RESULTS

After OIT using the rush protocol, patients tolerated a median dose of only 0.15 g peanut. Twenty-two of 23 patients continued with the long-term protocol. After a median of 7 months, 14 patients reached the protective dose. At the final DBPCFC, patients tolerated a median of 1 g (range, 0.25-4 g) in comparison with 0.19 g peanut at the DBPCFC before OIT (range, 0.02-1 g). In 2.6% of 6137 total daily doses, mild to moderate side effects were observed; in 1.3%, symptoms of pulmonary obstruction were detected. OIT was discontinued in 4 of 22 patients because of adverse events. There was a significant increase in peanut-specific serum IgG(4) and a decrease in peanut-specific IL-5, IL-4, and IL-2 production by PBMCs after OIT.

CONCLUSION

Long-term OIT appears to be safe and of some benefit in many patients with peanut allergy. With an increase in threshold levels and a reduction of peanut-specific T(H)2 cytokine production, the induction of tolerance may be feasible in some patients.

摘要

背景

目前针对花生过敏的唯一治疗方法是严格避免接触花生。

目的

研究口服免疫疗法(OIT)在花生过敏中的疗效和安全性。

方法

23 例 IgE 介导的花生过敏患儿(年龄 3.2-14.3 岁),通过双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验(DBPCFC)证实为阳性,采用速发型方案,7 天内给予烤花生。如果未能达到至少 0.5g 花生的保护剂量,则患者继续采用长程增量方案,每两周增加剂量,直至达到至少 0.5g 花生。随后进行 8 周的维持期,接着进行 2 周的花生回避期,最后进行最终的 DBPCFC。测定免疫参数。

结果

采用速发型方案进行 OIT 后,患者仅能耐受中位数剂量 0.15g 花生。23 例患者中有 22 例继续进行长程方案。中位时间 7 个月后,14 例患者达到保护剂量。在最终的 DBPCFC 中,患者耐受中位数剂量 1g(范围,0.25-4g),而 OIT 前 DBPCFC 中仅耐受 0.19g 花生(范围,0.02-1g)。在 6137 总日剂量中,观察到 2.6%出现轻度至中度副作用;1.3%出现阻塞性肺症状。因不良事件,22 例患者中有 4 例停止 OIT。OIT 后,花生特异性血清 IgG4 显著增加,PBMC 中花生特异性 IL-5、IL-4 和 IL-2 产生减少。

结论

长期 OIT 似乎对许多花生过敏患者是安全且有益的。随着阈值水平的提高和花生特异性 T(H)2 细胞因子产生的减少,在某些患者中诱导耐受可能是可行的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验