Suppr超能文献

日本过敏性花生过敏儿童的口服免疫疗法

Oral Immunotherapy in Japanese Children with Anaphylactic Peanut Allergy.

作者信息

Nagakura Ken-Ichi, Sato Sakura, Yanagida Noriyuki, Nishino Makoto, Asaumi Tomoyuki, Ogura Kiyotake, Ebisawa Motohiro

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan.

Department of Pediatrics, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2018;175(3):181-188. doi: 10.1159/000486310. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reports on oral immunotherapy (OIT) for anaphylactic food allergy are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of peanut OIT for anaphylactic patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 22 peanut anaphylactic patients who underwent OIT between 2011 and 2013, all of whom demonstrated anaphylaxis during a baseline double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. After starting in-hospital OIT, participants gradually increased ingestion to 795 mg of peanut protein per day at home and then took a maintenance dose (795 mg) daily. After 3 asymptomatic months, participants underwent an oral food challenge (OFC) of 795 mg after 2 weeks of peanut avoidance to confirm sustained unresponsiveness. The historical control group consisted of 11 patients with anaphylaxis by OFC and underwent the second OFC after 2 years.

RESULTS

All patients (22/22) achieved desensitization by 8 months after starting OIT and completed the protocol within 2 years. Two years later, 15/22 patients (68.1%) in the OIT group achieved sustained unresponsiveness, whereas only 2 (18.1%) in the control group passed the second OFC. After 2 years, the median peanut-specific IgE had significantly decreased (from 38.5 to 12.4 kUA/L) in the OIT group, but not in the control group. Median peanut- and Ara h 2-specific IgG4 in the OIT group had significantly increased from baseline after 1 month. The adverse reaction rate per ingestion was 43% in hospital and 5% at home. Three patients received adrenaline at the hospital and 2 at home.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that for patients with peanut anaphylaxis, OIT can increase the threshold and support achieving sustained unresponsiveness with relative safety.

摘要

背景

关于过敏性食物过敏的口服免疫疗法(OIT)的报道较少。我们研究了花生OIT对过敏性患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们纳入了2011年至2013年间接受OIT的22名花生过敏患者,所有患者在基线双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验中均出现过敏反应。开始住院OIT后,参与者在家中逐渐增加摄入量至每天795毫克花生蛋白,然后每天服用维持剂量(795毫克)。在3个月无症状期后,参与者在避免食用花生2周后接受795毫克的口服食物激发试验(OFC),以确认持续无反应性。历史对照组由11名通过OFC出现过敏反应的患者组成,并在2年后接受第二次OFC。

结果

所有患者(22/22)在开始OIT后8个月实现脱敏,并在2年内完成方案。两年后,OIT组22名患者中有15名(68.1%)实现持续无反应性,而对照组中只有2名(18.1%)通过第二次OFC。两年后,OIT组花生特异性IgE中位数显著下降(从38.5降至12.4 kUA/L),而对照组未下降。OIT组花生和Ara h 2特异性IgG4中位数在1个月后较基线显著增加。每次摄入的不良反应发生率在医院为43%,在家中为5%。3名患者在医院接受肾上腺素治疗,2名在家中接受治疗。

结论

这些数据表明,对于花生过敏患者,OIT可以提高阈值,并相对安全地支持实现持续无反应性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验