Suppr超能文献

“参与前”能力建设的阶段:发现、探索和试验联盟。

Phases of "pre-engagement" capacity building: discovery, exploration, and trial alliance.

作者信息

Campbell-Voytal Kimberly

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Science, Wayne State University School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010 Summer;4(2):155-62. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0118.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Academic prevention researchers who engage limited-resource communities may find that organizational or community capacity for prevention is low. Community organizations, neighborhoods, and academic partners may lack shared issue awareness, mutual interests, and interactive skills necessary for collaborative intervention. Existing capacity building models either ignore a 'pre-engagement' phase or acknowledge it without offering strategic detail. An exploratory or developmental phase before active engagement can be achieved through co-located work in a community setting. The construct, "ecology of practice," provides conceptual background for examining how "shared work" introduces and prepares partners for future collaboration consistent with community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles.

OBJECTIVE

This paper presents two case studies where pre-engagement capacity building involved partners who were initially unaware, disinterested, or unable to engage in preventive interventions. These cases illustrate how mutual participation in shared "ecologies of practice" enabled an exchange of cultural knowledge, skill, and language that laid the groundwork for future preventive intervention.

METHODS

A trajectory of developmental work in each case occurred over 5 years. Historical timelines, interviews, and personal communications between community and academic leaders were reviewed and common themes identified. A model of "pre-capacity building" emerged.

CONCLUSION

Capacity-building models that detail strategies for developing equitable engagement in under-resourced settings will more effectively move best practices into vulnerable communities. Preventive interventions must be translated equitably if health disparities are to be reduced.

摘要

背景

与资源有限的社区合作的学术预防研究人员可能会发现,社区的预防组织能力或社区能力较低。社区组织、社区以及学术合作伙伴可能缺乏对共同问题的认识、共同利益以及合作干预所需的互动技能。现有的能力建设模式要么忽略了“参与前”阶段,要么虽承认该阶段但未提供具体的策略细节。在社区环境中通过同地办公可以实现积极参与之前的探索或发展阶段。“实践生态”这一概念为研究“共享工作”如何根据基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)原则,引导并让合作伙伴为未来的合作做好准备提供了概念背景。

目的

本文介绍了两个案例研究,其中参与前的能力建设涉及到最初对预防性干预不知情、不感兴趣或无法参与的合作伙伴。这些案例说明了共同参与共享的“实践生态”如何实现文化知识、技能和语言的交流,从而为未来的预防性干预奠定基础。

方法

每个案例中的发展工作轨迹历时5年。回顾了社区和学术领袖之间的历史时间表、访谈及个人交流情况,并确定了共同主题。由此形成了一个“参与前能力建设”模型。

结论

详细说明在资源不足的环境中发展公平参与策略的能力建设模式,将能更有效地把最佳实践引入弱势社区。若要减少健康差距,预防性干预必须公平地实施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验