Fong Jessica H, Panchenko Anna R
National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Mol Biosyst. 2010 Oct;6(10):1821-8. doi: 10.1039/c005144f. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
Intrinsic disorder is believed to contribute to the ability of some proteins to interact with multiple partners which is important for protein functional promiscuity and regulation of the cross-talk between pathways. To better understand the mechanisms of molecular recognition through disordered regions, here, we systematically investigate the coupling between disorder and binding within domain families in a structure interaction network and in terminal and inter-domain linker regions. We showed that the canonical domain-domain interaction model should take into account contributions of N- and C-termini and inter-domain linkers, which may form all or part of the binding interfaces. For the majority of proteins, binding interfaces on domain and terminal regions were predicted to be less disordered than non-interface regions. Analysis of all domain families revealed several exceptions, such as kinases, DNA/RNA binding proteins, certain enzymes, and regulatory proteins, which are candidates for disorder-to-order transitions that can occur upon binding. Domain interfaces that bind single or multiple partners do not exhibit significant difference in disorder content if normalized by the number of interactions. In general, protein families with more diverse interactions exhibit less average disorder over all members of the family. Our results shed light on recent controversies regarding the relationship between disorder and binding of multiple partners at common interfaces. In particular, they support the hypothesis that protein domains with many interacting partners should have a pleiotropic effect on functional pathways and consequently might be more constrained in evolution.
内在无序被认为有助于某些蛋白质与多个伴侣相互作用的能力,这对于蛋白质功能的多效性以及信号通路间串扰的调节很重要。为了更好地理解通过无序区域进行分子识别的机制,在此我们系统地研究了结构相互作用网络以及结构域末端和结构域间连接区域中结构域家族内无序与结合之间的耦合关系。我们发现,典型的结构域-结构域相互作用模型应考虑N端和C端以及结构域间连接子的作用,它们可能构成全部或部分结合界面。对于大多数蛋白质而言,预测结构域和末端区域上的结合界面比非界面区域的无序程度更低。对所有结构域家族的分析揭示了几个例外情况,例如激酶、DNA/RNA结合蛋白、某些酶和调节蛋白,它们是结合时可能发生从无序到有序转变的候选对象。如果按相互作用数量进行归一化处理,结合单个或多个伴侣的结构域界面在无序含量上没有显著差异。一般来说,具有更多样化相互作用的蛋白质家族在所有家族成员中表现出的平均无序程度更低。我们的结果揭示了近期关于无序与共同界面上多个伴侣结合之间关系的争议。特别是,它们支持这样一种假说,即具有许多相互作用伴侣的蛋白质结构域应该对功能通路具有多效性影响,因此在进化过程中可能受到更多限制。