Swiss Paediatric Respiratory Research Group, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2010 Aug;40(8):1130-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03541.x. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
It has been suggested that there are several distinct phenotypes of childhood asthma or childhood wheezing. Here, we review the research relating to these phenotypes, with a focus on the methods used to define and validate them. Childhood wheezing disorders manifest themselves in a range of observable (phenotypic) features such as lung function, bronchial responsiveness, atopy and a highly variable time course (prognosis). The underlying causes are not sufficiently understood to define disease entities based on aetiology. Nevertheless, there is a need for a classification that would (i) facilitate research into aetiology and pathophysiology, (ii) allow targeted treatment and preventive measures and (iii) improve the prediction of long-term outcome. Classical attempts to define phenotypes have been one-dimensional, relying on few or single features such as triggers (exclusive viral wheeze vs. multiple trigger wheeze) or time course (early transient wheeze, persistent and late onset wheeze). These definitions are simple but essentially subjective. Recently, a multi-dimensional approach has been adopted. This approach is based on a wide range of features and relies on multivariate methods such as cluster or latent class analysis. Phenotypes identified in this manner are more complex but arguably more objective. Although phenotypes have an undisputed standing in current research on childhood asthma and wheezing, there is confusion about the meaning of the term 'phenotype' causing much circular debate. If phenotypes are meant to represent 'real' underlying disease entities rather than superficial features, there is a need for validation and harmonization of definitions. The multi-dimensional approach allows validation by replication across different populations and may contribute to a more reliable classification of childhood wheezing disorders and to improved precision of research relying on phenotype recognition, particularly in genetics. Ultimately, the underlying pathophysiology and aetiology will need to be understood to properly characterize the diseases causing recurrent wheeze in children.
有人提出,儿童哮喘或儿童喘息有几种不同的表型。在这里,我们回顾了与这些表型相关的研究,重点是用于定义和验证它们的方法。儿童喘息障碍表现为一系列可观察的(表型)特征,如肺功能、支气管反应性、特应性和高度可变的病程(预后)。其根本原因尚不清楚,无法根据病因来定义疾病实体。尽管如此,仍然需要一种分类方法,该方法将:(i) 有助于病因和病理生理学的研究;(ii) 允许进行有针对性的治疗和预防措施;(iii) 改善长期预后的预测。经典的表型定义方法是一维的,依赖于少数或单一特征,如诱因(排他性病毒性喘息与多种诱因性喘息)或病程(早期短暂性喘息、持续性和迟发性喘息)。这些定义很简单,但本质上是主观的。最近,采用了多维方法。这种方法基于广泛的特征,并依赖于多元方法,如聚类或潜在类别分析。以这种方式识别的表型更加复杂,但可以说是更客观的。尽管表型在当前儿童哮喘和喘息的研究中具有不可否认的地位,但“表型”一词的含义存在混淆,导致了大量的循环争论。如果表型旨在代表潜在的“真实”疾病实体,而不是表面特征,那么就需要验证和统一定义。多维方法允许通过在不同人群中复制来进行验证,这可能有助于更可靠地分类儿童喘息障碍,并提高依赖表型识别的研究的准确性,特别是在遗传学方面。最终,需要了解潜在的病理生理学和病因学,才能正确描述导致儿童反复喘息的疾病。