Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Epidemiol Infect. 2011 Apr;139(4):599-605. doi: 10.1017/S0950268810001391. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
Understanding local perceptions of disease causation could help public health officials improve strategies to prevent bloody diarrhoea. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Dhaka, Bangladesh to elicit community beliefs about the causes of and prevention strategies for bloody diarrhoea. Between March and June 2003, we interviewed 541 randomly selected respondents. Overall, 507 (93%) respondents perceived that a vaccine could prevent bloody diarrhoea. If a vaccine provided lifetime protection, 445 (83%) respondents stated that they would opt to get the vaccine and would pay a median of $0·05 (range U.S.$0·01-0·15) for it, equivalent to <1% of their median weekly income. There was almost universal perception that an effective vaccine to prevent bloody diarrhoea was highly beneficial and acceptable. While respondents valued a vaccine for prevention of bloody diarrhoea, they were only willing to pay minimally for it. Therefore, achieving a high rate of Shigella vaccine coverage may require subsidy of vaccine purchase.
了解当地对疾病病因的看法可能有助于公共卫生官员改进预防血便的策略。本研究在孟加拉国达卡进行了一项横断面调查,以了解社区对血便病因和预防策略的看法。2003 年 3 月至 6 月,我们随机采访了 541 名受访者。总体而言,507 名(93%)受访者认为疫苗可以预防血便。如果疫苗提供终身保护,445 名(83%)受访者表示他们将选择接种疫苗,并愿意支付中位数 0·05 美元(范围 0·01-0·15 美元),相当于他们周收入中位数的 <1%。几乎所有人都认为,预防血便的有效疫苗具有高度效益和可接受性。虽然受访者重视预防血便的疫苗,但他们只愿意为此支付很少的费用。因此,要实现高覆盖率的痢疾疫苗接种,可能需要补贴疫苗购买。