Laboratory of Psychophysiology, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Eur J Pain. 2011 Jan;15(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.05.011. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
Hot and ice-water immersions are commonly used for heterotopic noxious counter-stimulation (HNCS) in investigations on endogenous pain modulation. However, coincident sympathetic thermoregulatory activity does not allow to differentiate between perceptual hypoalgesia related to baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) or diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). The present study analysed the internal validity of another supposedly less confounded tonic pain model (inter-digital web pinching; IWP) regarding its potential as DNIC trigger. We performed a randomized controlled study in 24 healthy gender-matched drug-free volunteers aged 21-54 (median 25) years. The study protocol comprised the assessment of mechanical and thermal perceptual wind-up before and after an IWP (15N) or hot water immersion trial (HIT; 47.5°C) of 2 min duration. Wind-up was induced either by 10 repetitive (1Hz) contact heat (max. 49°C; 5×5 mm thermode) or ballistic impact stimuli (0.5g at 9 m/s) on the phalanges of the non-dominant hand. Cardiovascular activity, pain experience and corrugator muscle activity were continuously monitored. Although both HNCS forms produced a similar pain experience (45% of scale), a more pronounced cardiovascular activity was observable for the HIT (P<0.01). This indicates a higher baroreceptor activity and stronger contamination of painful water immersion by BRS-related hypoalgesia. Regardless of pain modality, wind-up was significantly reduced by HNCS, although this was stronger for painful water immersion than for noxious pinching (P<0.01). The HNCS types allow a differentiation between BRS-related and DNIC-like hypoalgesia. IWP proved its validity for DNIC induction, being practically non-confounded by BRS.
热和冰水浸浴常用于异源性有害性刺激的对照刺激(HNCS),以研究内源性疼痛调节。然而,同时发生的交感神经热调节活动不允许区分与血压反射敏感性(BRS)或弥散性伤害性抑制控制(DNIC)相关的知觉镇痛。本研究分析了另一种假定的较少混杂的紧张性疼痛模型(指间 web 夹捏;IWP)的内在有效性,以评估其作为 DNIC 触发因素的潜力。我们在 24 名健康、无药物、年龄在 21-54 岁(中位数 25 岁)的性别匹配的志愿者中进行了一项随机对照研究。研究方案包括在 IWP(15N)或热水浸浴试验(HIT;47.5°C)前后评估机械和热知觉的启动,浸浴时间为 2 分钟。启动通过 10 次重复(1Hz)接触热(最大 49°C;5×5mm 热测器)或弹道冲击刺激(0.5g,9m/s)在非优势手的指骨上诱导。连续监测心血管活动、疼痛体验和皱眉肌活动。尽管两种 HNCS 形式产生相似的疼痛体验(45%的量表),但 HIT 观察到更明显的心血管活动(P<0.01)。这表明更高的压力感受器活性和更强的 BRS 相关镇痛对疼痛性水浸浴的污染。无论疼痛方式如何,HNCS 均显著降低了启动,尽管水浸浴的疼痛比有害性夹捏更显著(P<0.01)。HNCS 类型允许区分 BRS 相关和 DNIC 样镇痛。IWP 证明了其作为 DNIC 诱导的有效性,实际上不受 BRS 的干扰。