• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BU 和 CY 联合预处理方案用于异基因造血干细胞移植的患者的应用顺序和肝毒性。

Order of application and liver toxicity in patients given BU and CY containing conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT.

机构信息

Division of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Mar;46(3):344-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.137. Epub 2010 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1038/bmt.2010.137
PMID:20548339
Abstract

BU-CY is the established non-TBI-based myeloablative conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. However, liver toxicity and hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) are frequent life-threatening complications. Pharmacological considerations suggest that BU can trigger toxicity of subsequent CY. Recent animal data confirmed this hypothesis. Less liver toxicity and better outcomes were observed when mice were treated with the reversed order of CY and BU. We analyzed in this study liver toxicity and outcome in patients receiving BU-CY (16 patients) or CY-BU (59 patients). Liver function differed significantly with higher levels of liver function tests between day +10 and +30, and a higher cumulative incidence of VOD in the BU-CY cohort (2/16 (12.5%) vs 0/59 (0%), P=0.006). TRM was significantly higher in patients receiving BU-CY (cumulative incidence BU-CY 45%, CY-BU 17%, P=0.02), without yet translating into a significant survival difference (incidence for survival: BU-CY 38%, CY-BU 63%; hazard ratio 1.19 for BU-CY, 95% confidence interval 0.29-4.82, P=0.80). Rates of engraftment and relapse were not different. These data support the concepts derived from animal models in favor of CY-BU compared with traditional BU-CY and form the basis for prospective controlled comparisons.

摘要

BU-CY 是目前用于异基因造血干细胞移植的非 TBI 基础上的骨髓清除性预处理方案。但是,肝毒性和肝静脉闭塞病(VOD)是常见的危及生命的并发症。药理学考虑表明 BU 可能会引发后续 CY 的毒性。最近的动物数据证实了这一假设。当用 CY 和 BU 的相反顺序治疗小鼠时,观察到较少的肝毒性和更好的结果。我们在本研究中分析了接受 BU-CY(16 例)或 CY-BU(59 例)治疗的患者的肝毒性和结果。肝功能在第 +10 天和 +30 天之间存在显著差异,且 BU-CY 组的 VOD 累积发生率更高(2/16(12.5%)比 0/59(0%),P=0.006)。接受 BU-CY 治疗的患者的 TRM 显著更高(BU-CY 的累积发生率为 45%,CY-BU 为 17%,P=0.02),但尚未转化为显著的生存差异(生存发生率:BU-CY 为 38%,CY-BU 为 63%;BU-CY 的风险比为 1.19,95%置信区间为 0.29-4.82,P=0.80)。植入和复发率没有差异。这些数据支持了源自动物模型的概念,即与传统的 BU-CY 相比,CY-BU 更有优势,并为前瞻性对照比较奠定了基础。

相似文献

1
Order of application and liver toxicity in patients given BU and CY containing conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT.BU 和 CY 联合预处理方案用于异基因造血干细胞移植的患者的应用顺序和肝毒性。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Mar;46(3):344-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.137. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
2
A Phase I study of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) in combination with busulfan and cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy) and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children with poor-risk CD33+ AML: a new targeted immunochemotherapy myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen.一项关于吉妥珠单抗奥佐米星(GO)联合白消安和环磷酰胺(Bu/Cy)以及异基因造血干细胞移植治疗 CD33+ 高危 AML 患儿的 I 期研究:一种新的靶向免疫化疗清髓性预处理(MAC)方案。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Feb;18(2):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
3
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in remission: comparison of intravenous busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (Cy) versus total-body irradiation plus Cy as conditioning regimen--a report from the acute leukemia working party of the European group for blood and marrow transplantation.缓解期急性髓系白血病的异基因造血干细胞移植:静脉用白消安加环磷酰胺(Cy)与全身照射加 Cy 作为预处理方案的比较——欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会急性白血病工作组的报告。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 1;31(28):3549-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8114. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
4
The effect of administration order of BU and CY on toxicity in hematopoietic SCT in humans.白消安(BU)和环磷酰胺(CY)给药顺序对人类造血干细胞移植毒性的影响。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009 Jun;43(11):883-5. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.404. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
5
[Efficacy and toxicity of intravenous busulfan-based conditioning before allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for leukemia].[白血病异基因外周血干细胞移植前基于静脉注射白消安的预处理方案的疗效与毒性]
Ai Zheng. 2007 Aug;26(8):914-8.
6
Busulfan and cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy) as a preparative regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single-institution experience.白消安和环磷酰胺(Bu/Cy)作为非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者自体干细胞移植的预处理方案:单中心经验
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Nov;15(11):1447-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.07.014. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
7
Comparison of Cyclophosphamide Combined with Total Body Irradiation, Oral Busulfan, or Intravenous Busulfan for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.环磷酰胺联合全身照射、口服白消安或静脉注射白消安用于成人急性淋巴细胞白血病异基因造血细胞移植的比较
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Dec;22(12):2194-2200. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
8
Comparison of new flu-bu12-tg conditioning with the standard bu-cy myeloablative regimen in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia.新的氟达拉滨-白消安-环磷酰胺预处理方案与标准白消安-环磷酰胺清髓方案在接受异基因干细胞移植治疗急性髓系白血病患者中的比较。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2011 Dec;155(4):327-32. doi: 10.5507/bp.2011.040.
9
[Comparison of two conditioning regimens in treatment of leukemia by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation].两种预处理方案在异基因造血干细胞移植治疗白血病中的比较
Ai Zheng. 2003 Jun;22(6):620-3.
10
Busulfan-cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide-busulfan as conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a prospective randomized trial.白消安-环磷酰胺与环磷酰胺-白消安作为异基因造血细胞移植前的预处理方案:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Hematol. 2021 Jan;100(1):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04312-y. Epub 2020 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms underlying seizures and hypothermia during busulphan administration.白消安给药期间癫痫发作和体温过低的潜在机制。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2025 May 3. doi: 10.1038/s41409-025-02608-z.
2
Cyclophosphamide Pharmacogenomic Variation in Cancer Treatment and Its Effect on Bioactivation and Pharmacokinetics.环磷酰胺在癌症治疗中的药物基因组学变异及其对生物活化和药代动力学的影响。
Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2024 Jun 27;2024:4862706. doi: 10.1155/2024/4862706. eCollection 2024.
3
Is there any difference between busulfan-cyclophosphamide and cyclophosphamide-busulfan in patients underwent allogeneic transplantation?
接受异基因移植的患者中,白消安-环磷酰胺方案与环磷酰胺-白消安方案之间有差异吗?
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2021 Oct-Dec;43(4):527-528. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
4
Does the order of busulfan and cyclophosphamide affect allogeneic stem cell transplantation related liver toxicity?白消安和环磷酰胺的用药顺序会影响异基因干细胞移植相关的肝毒性吗?
Ann Hematol. 2021 Jul;100(7):1911-1912. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04515-x. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
5
Busulfan-cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide-busulfan as conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a prospective randomized trial.白消安-环磷酰胺与环磷酰胺-白消安作为异基因造血细胞移植前的预处理方案:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Hematol. 2021 Jan;100(1):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04312-y. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
6
Evaluation of Reversed Administration Order of Busulfan (BU) and Cyclophosphamide (CY) as Conditioning on Liver Toxicity in Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (ALL-HSCT).评估白消安(BU)和环磷酰胺(CY)的给药顺序颠倒作为异基因造血干细胞移植(ALL-HSCT)预处理对肝脏毒性的影响。
Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2020 Jul 1;14(3):171-176. doi: 10.18502/ijhoscr.v14i3.3725.
7
Flavin-containing monooxygenase 3 (FMO3) role in busulphan metabolic pathway.含黄素单加氧酶3(FMO3)在白消安代谢途径中的作用。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187294. eCollection 2017.
8
Clarifying busulfan metabolism and drug interactions to support new therapeutic drug monitoring strategies: a comprehensive review.阐明白消安代谢及药物相互作用以支持新的治疗药物监测策略:一项全面综述
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2017 Sep;13(9):901-923. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1360277. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
9
The Association of Combined and Genotype Status with the Occurrence of Hemorrhagic Cystitis in Pediatric Patients Receiving Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.接受异基因造血干细胞移植前采用清髓性预处理方案的儿科患者中,联合状态和基因型状态与出血性膀胱炎发生的相关性
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jul 11;8:451. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00451. eCollection 2017.
10
Busulfan-Melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma or Ewing sarcoma: an exposed-unexposed study evaluating the clinical impact of the order of drug administration.白消安-美法仑序贯自体干细胞移植治疗高危神经母细胞瘤或尤因肉瘤患者:一项评估给药顺序临床影响的暴露-未暴露研究
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Sep;51(9):1265-7. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.109. Epub 2016 Apr 25.