Howarth Robert W
Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, NY 14853, USA.
Sci China C Life Sci. 2005 Sep;48 Suppl 2:791-806. doi: 10.1007/BF03187119.
Two-thirds of the coastal rivers and bays in the United States are degraded from nutrient pollution, and nitrogen inputs these waters continue to increase. The nitrogen comes from a variety of sources, including runoff from agricultural fields, concentrated animal feeding operations, atmospheric deposition from fossil fuel combustion, and sewage and septic wastes. Technical solutions for nitrogen pollution exist at reasonable cost. That most of these solutions have not yet been implemented to any significant extent across the United States suggests that new policy approaches are necessary. The best solution may involve a combination of voluntary and mandatory approaches, applying different approaches to different sources of nitrogen pollution. A watershed-based approach that relies heavily on voluntary mechanisms (such as crop-yield insurance to reduce over-fertilization) is likely to be the most effective for some sources of nitrogen (such as runoff from agricultural fields), while a uniform national regulatory approach may be better for others (such as NO(x) emissions from fossil fuel combustion). Implementation of management strategies should be carefully coupled to monitoring programs to assess the effectiveness of these strategies. While both nitrogen and phosphorus are important to control, the focus should be on nitrogen management, in part because nitrogen is more generally the causal agent of coastal eutrophication. Also, while nitrogen-control practices tend to also reduce phosphorus pollution, phosphorus-control practices often have little effect on nitrogen. Although current scientific and technical knowledge is sufficient to begin to make substantial progress toward solving coastal nitrogen pollution, progress will be made more quickly and more cost effectively with increased investment in appropriate scientific research.
美国三分之二的沿海河流和海湾因营养物污染而退化,且这些水域的氮输入量持续增加。氮来自多种来源,包括农田径流、集中式动物饲养场、化石燃料燃烧产生的大气沉降以及污水和化粪池废物。存在成本合理的氮污染技术解决方案。然而,这些解决方案在美国大部分地区尚未得到大规模实施,这表明需要新的政策方法。最佳解决方案可能涉及自愿和强制方法的结合,针对不同的氮污染源采用不同的方法。一种严重依赖自愿机制(如作物产量保险以减少过度施肥)的流域方法,对于某些氮源(如农田径流)可能是最有效的,而统一的国家监管方法可能对其他一些氮源(如化石燃料燃烧产生的氮氧化物排放)更好。管理策略的实施应与监测计划紧密结合,以评估这些策略的有效性。虽然控制氮和磷都很重要,但重点应放在氮管理上,部分原因是氮通常是沿海富营养化的成因。此外,虽然控制氮的措施往往也能减少磷污染,但控制磷的措施通常对氮影响很小。尽管目前的科学技术知识足以在解决沿海氮污染方面取得实质性进展,但增加对适当科学研究的投资将能更快、更经济高效地取得进展。