• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

桡动脉血流介导的扩张可预测经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗中的动脉痉挛。

Radial artery flow-mediated dilation predicts arterial spasm during transradial coronary interventions.

机构信息

Cardiology Department and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Athens General Hospital G. Gennimatas, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Apr 1;77(5):649-54. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22688.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.22688
PMID:20549693
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transradial coronary catheterization has emerged over the last years as a favorable catheterization practice, based on evidence that it is associated with less vascular complications and shorter hospital stays. However, access site crossover appears to be more frequent when the initial route is the transradial one, one of the main reasons being arterial spasm. We hypothesized that radial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) measurements could be used as a preprocedural method to assess the likelihood of arterial spasm.

METHODS

The study population consisted of patients scheduled for transradial diagnostic catheterization in whom ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed. FMD was measured 1-2 days before PCI. The primary endpoint of the study was operator-defined (operators were blinded as to the FMD results) radial artery spasm.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients (110 male, age 65.3 ± 9) were included. Radial artery spasm was recorded in 13 patients (7.6%). FMD showed a very significant univariate association with the occurrence of spasm (P < 0.001) and was the most important predictor of spasm in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (beta -3.15; P < 0.001), followed by baseline radial artery diameter (P = 0.04), the number of catheters used (P = 0.049) and the administered volume of contrast medium (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Preprocedural FMD is a significant predictor of arterial spasm before elective transradial PCI. It is a low cost, safe, and feasible noninvasive modality, whose results might be taken into account when deciding on the vascular access route for an elective procedure, the size of sheaths or catheters to be used or the intensity of antispasm medication.

摘要

背景

近年来,经桡动脉冠状动脉造影术已成为一种有利的导管插入术,因为它与较少的血管并发症和较短的住院时间有关。然而,当初始途径是经桡动脉途径时,似乎更频繁地出现入路部位交叉,其中主要原因之一是动脉痉挛。我们假设,桡动脉血流介导的扩张(FMD)测量可作为一种术前方法来评估动脉痉挛的可能性。

方法

研究人群包括计划经桡动脉进行诊断性导管插入术的患者,其中进行了专门的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。FMD 在 PCI 前 1-2 天测量。该研究的主要终点是操作者定义的(操作者对 FMD 结果不知情)桡动脉痉挛。

结果

共纳入 172 例患者(110 例男性,年龄 65.3±9 岁)。13 例患者(7.6%)记录到桡动脉痉挛。FMD 与痉挛的发生具有非常显著的单变量相关性(P<0.001),并且在多变量逻辑回归分析中是痉挛的最重要预测因素(β-3.15;P<0.001),其次是基线桡动脉直径(P=0.04)、使用的导管数量(P=0.049)和施用的造影剂体积(P=0.017)。

结论

术前 FMD 是择期经桡动脉 PCI 前动脉痉挛的重要预测指标。它是一种低成本、安全且可行的非侵入性方法,在决定择期手术的血管入路、要使用的鞘管或导管的大小或抗痉挛药物的强度时,可以考虑其结果。

相似文献

1
Radial artery flow-mediated dilation predicts arterial spasm during transradial coronary interventions.桡动脉血流介导的扩张可预测经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗中的动脉痉挛。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Apr 1;77(5):649-54. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22688.
2
Predicting patients prone to radial artery spasm: use of flow-mediated dilation testing.预测易发生桡动脉痉挛的患者:血流介导的血管舒张功能检测的应用
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Apr 1;77(5):655-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23072.
3
Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study.导引导管鞘的长度和亲水涂层对经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉痉挛的影响:一项随机研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 May;3(5):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.009.
4
A predictive score of radial artery spasm in patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗患者桡动脉痉挛的预测评分
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jun 1;188:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.024. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
5
Reduction in spasm with a long hydrophylic transradial sheath.长亲水桡动脉鞘管减少血管痉挛。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Nov 1;76(5):668-72. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22552.
6
Radial artery spasm during transradial cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predisposing factors, prevention, and management.经桡动脉心脏导管插入术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的桡动脉痉挛:发生率、诱发因素、预防及处理
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012 May-Jun;13(3):193-5. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
7
Flow-mediated dilatation to relieve puncture-induced radial artery spasm: A pilot study.血流介导的扩张以缓解穿刺引起的桡动脉痉挛:一项初步研究。
Cardiol J. 2018;25(1):1-6. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0125. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
8
Moderate procedural sedation and opioid analgesia during transradial coronary interventions to prevent spasm: a prospective randomized study.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗中中程程序性镇静和阿片类镇痛预防痉挛:一项前瞻性随机研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;6(3):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.11.005.
9
Long-Term Radial Artery Patency Following Transradial Coronary Catheterization via a 7-Fr Sheath.经7F鞘管行经桡动脉冠状动脉导管插入术后桡动脉的长期通畅情况
Isr Med Assoc J. 2016 May;18(5):290-3.
10
Effect of duration of hemostatic compression on radial artery occlusion after transradial access.经桡动脉入路止血压迫时间对桡动脉闭塞的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jan 1;79(1):78-81. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22963. Epub 2011 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Brachial Compression Versus Ulnar Compression on Radial Artery Diameter: A Randomized Controlled Trial.肱动脉压迫与尺动脉压迫对桡动脉直径影响的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Vasc Med. 2024 Nov 14;2024:9965794. doi: 10.1155/2024/9965794. eCollection 2024.
2
Radial Artery Spasm-A Review on Incidence, Prevention and Treatment.桡动脉痉挛——发病率、预防与治疗综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;14(17):1897. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14171897.
3
Flow-mediated dilatation facilitates transradial coronary angiography: a comparative study.
血流介导的血管扩张有助于经桡动脉冠状动脉造影:一项比较研究。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024 Jun;20(2):133-138. doi: 10.5114/aic.2024.139716. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
4
Radial artery occlusion after percutaneous coronary interventions - an underestimated issue.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后桡动脉闭塞——一个被低估的问题。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2013;9(4):353-61. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2013.38865. Epub 2013 Nov 18.