Department of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Cancer. 2010 Sep 15;116(18):4256-65. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25219.
A phase 3 trial demonstrated superiority at interim analysis for everolimus over placebo in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) progressing on vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Final results and analysis of prognostic factors are reported.
Patients with mRCC (N = 416) were randomized (2:1) to everolimus 10 mg/d (n = 277) or placebo (n = 139) plus best supportive care. Progression-free survival (PFS) and safety were assessed to the end of double-blind treatment. Mature overall survival (OS) data were analyzed, and prognostic factors for survival were investigated by multivariate analyses. A rank-preserving structural failure time model estimated the effect on OS, correcting for crossover from placebo to everolimus.
The median PFS was 4.9 months (everolimus) versus 1.9 months (placebo) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; P < .001) by independent central review and 5.5 months (everolimus) versus 1.9 months (placebo) (HR, 0.32; P < .001) by investigators. Serious adverse events with everolimus, independent of causality, in ≥ 5% of patients included infections (all types, 10%), dyspnea (7%), and fatigue (5%). The median OS was 14.8 months (everolimus) versus 14.4 months (placebo) (HR, 0.87; P = .162), with 80% of patients in the placebo arm crossed over to everolimus. By the rank-preserving structural failure time model, the survival corrected for crossover was 1.9-fold longer (95% confidence interval, 0.5-8.5) with everolimus compared with placebo only. Independent prognostic factors for shorter OS in the study included low performance status, high corrected calcium, low hemoglobin, and prior sunitinib (P < .01).
These results established the efficacy and safety of everolimus in patients with mRCC after progression on sunitinib and/or sorafenib.
一项 3 期临床试验在中期分析中证明,依维莫司在接受血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(VEGF-TKI)治疗后进展的转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者中的疗效优于安慰剂。现报道最终结果和预后因素分析。
将 416 例 mRCC 患者(N=416)按 2:1 的比例随机分为依维莫司 10mg/d(n=277)或安慰剂(n=139)联合最佳支持治疗。在双盲治疗结束时评估无进展生存期(PFS)和安全性。对成熟的总生存期(OS)数据进行分析,并通过多变量分析研究生存的预后因素。秩保持结构失效时间模型估计 OS 的影响,校正从安慰剂到依维莫司的交叉。
独立中心评估显示,中位 PFS 为 4.9 个月(依维莫司)vs 1.9 个月(安慰剂)(风险比[HR],0.33;P<0.001),研究者评估结果为 5.5 个月(依维莫司)vs 1.9 个月(安慰剂)(HR,0.32;P<0.001)。依维莫司≥5%患者发生的严重不良事件与因果关系无关,包括感染(所有类型,10%)、呼吸困难(7%)和疲劳(5%)。中位 OS 为 14.8 个月(依维莫司)vs 14.4 个月(安慰剂)(HR,0.87;P=0.162),安慰剂组 80%的患者交叉至依维莫司。通过秩保持结构失效时间模型,校正交叉后,依维莫司的生存时间是安慰剂的 1.9 倍(95%置信区间,0.5-8.5)。该研究中,OS 较短的独立预后因素包括低表现状态、校正钙升高、低血红蛋白和先前舒尼替尼(P<0.01)。
这些结果确立了依维莫司在接受舒尼替尼和/或索拉非尼治疗后进展的 mRCC 患者中的疗效和安全性。