Suppr超能文献

什么决定了自评健康(SRH)?EPIC-Norfolk 队列中 SF-36 健康领域的横断面研究。

What determines Self-Rated Health (SRH)? A cross-sectional study of SF-36 health domains in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort.

机构信息

General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Sep;65(9):800-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.090845. Epub 2010 Jun 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-Rated Health (SRH) as assessed by a single-item measure is an independent predictor of health outcomes. However, it remains uncertain which elements of the subjective health experience it most strongly captures. In view of its ability to predict outcomes, elucidation of what determines SRH is potentially important in the provision of services. This study aimed to determine the extent to which dimensions of physical, mental and social functioning are associated with SRH.

METHODS

We studied 20,853 men and women aged 39-79 years from a population-based cohort study (European Prospective Investigation of Cancer study) who had completed an SRH (Short Form (SF)-1) measure and SF-36 questionnaire. SF-36 subscales were used to quantify dimensions of health best predicting poor or fair SRH within a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

In multivariate models adjusting for age, gender, social class, medical conditions and depression, all subscales of the SF-36 were independently associated with SRH, with the Physical Functioning subscale more strongly associated with poor or fair compared with excellent, very good or good health (OR 3.7 (95% CI 3.3 to 4.1)) than Mental Health (OR 1.4 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.5)) or Social Functioning subscales (OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.0)) for those below and above the median.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that physical functioning is more strongly associated with SRH than mental health and social functioning, even where the relative associations between each dimension and SRH may be expected to differ, such as in those with depression. It suggests that the way people take account of physical, mental and social dimensions of function when rating their health may be relatively stable across groups.

摘要

背景

通过单项测量评估的自评健康(SRH)是健康结果的独立预测因子。然而,它仍然不确定它最能捕捉到主观健康体验的哪些方面。鉴于其预测结果的能力,阐明决定 SRH 的因素对于提供服务可能很重要。本研究旨在确定身体、心理和社会功能的各个方面与 SRH 的关联程度。

方法

我们研究了来自基于人群的队列研究(欧洲癌症前瞻性调查研究)的 20853 名年龄在 39-79 岁的男性和女性,他们完成了 SRH(简短表格(SF)-1)测量和 SF-36 问卷。SF-36 子量表用于在逻辑回归模型中量化最能预测不良或一般 SRH 的健康维度。

结果

在调整年龄、性别、社会阶层、医疗状况和抑郁的多变量模型中,SF-36 的所有子量表均与 SRH 独立相关,与心理健康(OR 1.4(95%CI 1.2 至 1.5))或社会功能子量表(OR 1.8(95%CI 1.6 至 2.0))相比,身体功能子量表与较差或一般健康的关系更为密切(OR 3.7(95%CI 3.3 至 4.1))与良好的健康相比,对于中位数以下和以上的人群。

结论

本研究证实,身体功能与 SRH 的相关性强于心理健康和社会功能,即使每个维度与 SRH 的相对关联可能不同,例如在抑郁症患者中。这表明,人们在评估健康时考虑身体、心理和社会功能维度的方式在不同人群中可能相对稳定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验