Suppr超能文献

非愈合伤口对照研究与比较研究的结果:提高伤口管理证据质量的建议。

Outcomes in controlled and comparative studies on non-healing wounds: recommendations to improve the quality of evidence in wound management.

作者信息

Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Price P

机构信息

Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 2010 Jun;19(6):237-68. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2010.19.6.48471.

Abstract

While there is a consensus that clinical practice should be evidence based, this can be difficult to achieve due to confusion about the value of the various approaches to wound management. To address this, the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) set up a Patient Outcome Group whose remit was to produce recommendations on clinical data collection in wound care. This document, produced by the group and disseminated by JWC, identifies criteria for producing rigorous outcomes in both randomised controlled trials and clinical studies, and describes how to ensure studies are consistent and reproducible.

摘要

虽然大家一致认为临床实践应以证据为基础,但由于对各种伤口处理方法的价值存在困惑,这一点可能难以实现。为解决这一问题,欧洲伤口管理协会(EWMA)成立了一个患者结果小组,其职责是就伤口护理临床数据收集提出建议。该小组编写并由JWC发布的这份文件确定了在随机对照试验和临床研究中产生严格结果的标准,并描述了如何确保研究的一致性和可重复性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验