Suppr超能文献

全肠外营养人群中心静脉导管相关性血流感染的诊断:阳性中央静脉导管移除后脓毒症退热的纳入。

Diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in a total parenteral nutrition population: inclusion of sepsis defervescence after removal of culture-positive central venous catheter.

机构信息

Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2010 Oct;76(2):119-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 Jun 16.

Abstract

Defervescence of sepsis after removal of culture-positive central venous catheters (CVCs) has been advocated for diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) even without positive blood culture. However, most studies report CRBSI incidence only when blood cultures, and CVC tip, are positive (standard definition). We examined the effect of inclusion of defervescence criteria on CRBSI incidence in a total parenteral nutrition (TPN) population. The study was carried out in a 525 bed tertiary referral hospital for a period of 12 years. CRBSI incidence was compared between standard definition (positive CVC tip culture and positive blood culture) and when 'defervescence criteria' were included. Sepsis defervescence was defined as a fall in temperature, white cell count and sepsis resolution after CVC removal, with positive CVC tip culture, but negative blood cultures. CRBSI episodes in which a blood culture was omitted were excluded. The study population included 1365 patients in whom 2536 CVCs were used over a period of 15 234 CVC-days. There were 192 CRBSI episodes in 165 patients. In all, 152 CRBSI episodes met only the standard criteria for CRBSI whereas 40 episodes met the defervescence criteria. The standard definition alone resulted in a mean (+/- SD) incidence of 10.6+/-5.8 per 1000 CVC-days. This increased to 13+/-6.4 per 1000 CVC-days when defervescence criteria were included. Inclusion of defervescence criteria increased CRBSI incidence by a mean of 2.5+/-1.4 episodes per 1000 days or 27% (95% CI: 1.61-3.339; P<0.001). This study implies that the scale of CRBSI may be higher than is currently recognised and that the blood culture positivity rate for CRBSI is 79% (152/192).

摘要

在去除培养阳性的中心静脉导管(CVC)后,败血症的退热被认为是导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)的诊断标准,即使没有阳性血培养。然而,大多数研究报告仅在血培养和 CVC 尖端阳性时才报告 CRBSI 发生率(标准定义)。我们在全肠外营养(TPN)人群中检查了纳入退热标准对 CRBSI 发生率的影响。该研究在一家 525 张床位的三级转诊医院进行了 12 年。比较了标准定义(CVC 尖端培养阳性和血培养阳性)与纳入“退热标准”时的 CRBSI 发生率。败血症退热定义为 CVC 去除后体温、白细胞计数下降和败血症缓解,CVC 尖端培养阳性,但血培养阴性。排除了未进行血培养的 CRBSI 发作。研究人群包括 1365 名患者,他们在 15234 个 CVC 日期间使用了 2536 个 CVC。165 名患者中有 192 例发生 CRBSI。共有 152 例 CRBSI 仅符合 CRBSI 的标准标准,而 40 例符合退热标准。仅采用标准定义,平均(+/-SD)每 1000 CVC 天发生率为 10.6+/-5.8。当纳入退热标准时,这一比例增加到 13+/-6.4 每 1000 CVC 天。纳入退热标准使 CRBSI 发生率平均增加每 1000 天 2.5+/-1.4 例,增加 27%(95%CI:1.61-3.339;P<0.001)。本研究表明,CRBSI 的规模可能高于目前的认识,CRBSI 的血培养阳性率为 79%(152/192)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验