Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Eur Urol. 2010 Oct;58(4):596-601. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.044. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
Although oncologic outcomes appear to be similar after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN), data on renal function are lacking.
To evaluate the change over time in renal function after LPN and OPN.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We identified 987 patients with a single sporadic tumor and a normal contralateral kidney who were treated by LPN (n=182) and OPN (n=805) between January 2002 and July 2009.
All patients underwent LPN or OPN at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. We created a multivariable generalized estimating equations linear model that predicted GFR based on the time from surgery, preoperative GFR, tumor size, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and ischemia time.
Mean patient age, tumor size, and ASA score were similar between LPN and OPN patients. The baseline preoperative GFR was lower in the laparoscopic group (67 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) vs 73 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); p<0.001). The mean ischemia time was shorter after LPN than OPN (35 min vs 40 min, respectively; p<0.001). In a multivariable model, the interaction term between time from surgery and approach was statistically significant (p=0.045), indicating that there was a differential effect on recovery of renal function over time by approach. Laparoscopically treated patients maintained a slightly higher renal function than those treated via an open approach. The 2-mo and 6-mo predicted GFR for a typical patient increased slightly from 65 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) to 67 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively, for those treated laparoscopically but remained constant at 62 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) after OPN.
Our data suggest that the surgical approach has a small effect on the recovery of renal function after partial nephrectomy. Laparoscopically treated patients maintained slightly higher renal function.
虽然腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)和开放性部分肾切除术(OPN)后的肿瘤学结果似乎相似,但有关肾功能的数据尚缺乏。
评估 LPN 和 OPN 后肾功能随时间的变化。
设计、地点和参与者:我们确定了 2002 年 1 月至 2009 年 7 月期间在纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心接受 LPN(n=182)和 OPN(n=805)治疗的 987 例单发孤立肿瘤且对侧肾脏正常的患者。
所有患者均在 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 接受 LPN 或 OPN 治疗。
使用简化的肾脏病饮食改良公式计算估计肾小球滤过率(GFR)。我们创建了一个多变量广义估计方程线性模型,该模型根据手术时间、术前 GFR、肿瘤大小、美国麻醉医师协会评分和缺血时间预测 GFR。
LPN 和 OPN 患者的平均患者年龄、肿瘤大小和 ASA 评分相似。腹腔镜组的基线术前 GFR 较低(67 ml/min/1.73 m² vs 73 ml/min/1.73 m²;p<0.001)。LPN 后的平均缺血时间短于 OPN(分别为 35 分钟和 40 分钟;p<0.001)。在多变量模型中,手术时间与方法之间的交互项具有统计学意义(p=0.045),表明方法对肾功能随时间的恢复有不同的影响。接受腹腔镜治疗的患者的肾功能略高于接受开放手术的患者。对于典型患者,术后 2 个月和 6 个月的预测 GFR 分别从 65 ml/min/1.73 m²略微增加到 67 ml/min/1.73 m²,而接受 OPN 的患者则保持在 62 ml/min/1.73 m²不变。
我们的数据表明,手术方法对部分肾切除术后肾功能的恢复有微小影响。接受腹腔镜治疗的患者保持了略高的肾功能。