Department of Paediatric Neurology, Paediatrics Centre of Excellence, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010 Sep;14(5):434-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
A Prolonged convulsive seizure is the most common neurological medical emergency with poor outcome. An ideal anticonvulsant should be easy-to-use, effective, and safe, and it should also have a long-lasting effect. Benzodiazepines, give via the intravenous or rectal route have generally been used as first-line drugs. In small children, IV access can be difficult and time consuming. Midazolam is a potent anticonvulsant and is rapidly absorbed from the rectal, nasal, and buccal mucosa. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and usability of buccal midazolam in controlling seizures in children with acute prolonged seizures, by comparing it with rectal diazepam. Ninety-eight patients were enrolled, with 49 patients in each treatment group. In the buccal midazolam group, 42 (88%) patients were controlled in less than 4 min of drug administration, and all of the patients were controlled within 5 min of drug administration. In the rectal diazepam group, 24 (49%) patients were controlled in less than 4 min and 40 (82%) patients were controlled within 5 min of drug administration. The time for drug administration and drug effect was significantly less with buccal midazolam than with rectal diazepam (p value<0.001). In the buccal midazolam group, 46 (94%) parents were satisfied with their child's treatment and route of drug administration while in the rectal diazepam group, 7 (14%) parents were satisfied. Buccal midazolam was significantly more acceptable than rectal diazepam (p value<0.001). In conclusion, buccal midazolam may be as effective as rectal diazepam but more convenient to use in the controlling acute prolonged seizures in children, especially in situations in which there is a difficulty in gaining IV access, for example, in infants.
长时间的惊厥发作是最常见的神经科急症,预后较差。理想的抗惊厥药物应该易于使用、有效且安全,并且还应具有持久的效果。静脉或直肠途径给予苯二氮䓬类药物通常被用作一线药物。在小儿童中,建立静脉通路可能既困难又耗时。咪达唑仑是一种有效的抗惊厥药,可从直肠、鼻腔和口腔黏膜迅速吸收。我们的目的是通过与直肠地西泮比较,评估口腔咪达唑仑在控制急性长时间惊厥发作儿童中的疗效和可用性。共纳入 98 例患者,每组 49 例。在口腔咪达唑仑组中,42 例(88%)患者在给药后 4 分钟内得到控制,所有患者在给药后 5 分钟内得到控制。在直肠地西泮组中,24 例(49%)患者在 4 分钟内得到控制,40 例(82%)患者在 5 分钟内得到控制。口腔咪达唑仑给药时间和药物作用时间明显短于直肠地西泮(p 值<0.001)。在口腔咪达唑仑组中,46 例(94%)家长对孩子的治疗和给药途径满意,而在直肠地西泮组中,只有 7 例(14%)家长满意。口腔咪达唑仑明显比直肠地西泮更能被家长接受(p 值<0.001)。总之,口腔咪达唑仑可能与直肠地西泮一样有效,但在控制儿童急性长时间惊厥发作时更方便使用,尤其是在难以建立静脉通路的情况下,例如婴儿。