Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main and Department of Neurology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
LOEWE Center for Personalized Translational Epilepsy Research (CePTER), Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019 Dec;6(12):2413-2425. doi: 10.1002/acn3.50932. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
We sought to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal midazolam (in-MDZ) as first-line inhospital therapy in patients with status epilepticus (SE) during continuous EEG recording.
Data on medical history, etiology and semiology of SE, anticonvulsive medication usage, efficacy and safety of in-MDZ were retrospectively reviewed between 2015 and 2018. Time to end of SE regarding the administration of in-MDZ and ß-band effects were analyzed on EEG and with frequency analysis.
In total, 42 patients (mean age: 52.7 ± 22.7 years; 23 females) were treated with a median dose of 5 mg of in-MDZ (range: 2.5-15 mg, mean: 6.4 mg, SD: 2.6) for SE. The majority of the patients suffered from nonconvulsive SE (n = 24; 55.8%). In total, 24 (57.1%) patients were responders, as SE stopped following the administration of in-MDZ without any other drugs being given. On average, SE ceased on EEG at 05:05 (minutes:seconds) after the application of in-MDZ (median: 04:56; range: 00:29-14:53; SD:03:13). Frequency analysis showed an increased ß-band on EEG after the application of in-MDZ at 04:07 on average (median: 03:50; range: 02:20-05:40; SD: 01:09). Adverse events were recorded in six patients (14.3%), with nasal irritations present in five (11.9%) and prolonged sedation occurring in one (2.6%) patient.
This pharmaco-EEG-based study showed that in-MDZ is effective and well-tolerated for the acute treatment of SE. EEG and clinical effects of in-MDZ administration occurred within 04:07 and 5:05 on average. Intranasal midazolam appears to be an easily applicable and rapidly effective alternative to buccal or intramuscular application as first-line treatment if an intravenous route is not available.
我们旨在评估在连续脑电图记录期间,作为癫痫持续状态(SE)院内一线治疗的鼻内咪达唑仑(in-MDZ)的疗效和耐受性。
回顾性分析了 2015 年至 2018 年期间,在接受 in-MDZ 治疗的患者的病史、病因和 SE 半侧化、抗惊厥药物使用、in-MDZ 的疗效和安全性方面的数据。通过脑电图和频域分析,分析了 in-MDZ 给药后 SE 结束的时间和β频带效应。
共 42 例患者(平均年龄:52.7±22.7 岁;23 例女性)接受中位数剂量为 5mg in-MDZ(范围:2.5-15mg,平均:6.4mg,SD:2.6)治疗 SE。大多数患者患有非惊厥性 SE(n=24;55.8%)。共有 24 例(57.1%)患者为反应者,即给予 in-MDZ 后无需再给予其他药物,SE 停止。平均而言,in-MDZ 给药后,脑电图上的 SE 在 05:05(分钟:秒)停止(中位数:04:56;范围:00:29-14:53;SD:03:13)。频域分析显示,in-MDZ 给药后,脑电图上的β频带平均在 04:07 增加(中位数:03:50;范围:02:20-05:40;SD:01:09)。6 例(14.3%)患者出现不良反应,5 例(11.9%)出现鼻腔刺激,1 例(2.6%)出现延长镇静。
这项基于药物-脑电图的研究表明,in-MDZ 是治疗 SE 的有效且耐受良好的药物。in-MDZ 给药后的脑电图和临床效果平均在 04:07 和 5:05 出现。如果无法建立静脉通路,鼻内咪达唑仑作为一线治疗药物,可替代口腔或肌肉内应用,具有易于应用和快速有效的特点。