Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Feb;64(2):209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.04.051. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
Major efforts have been undertaken to reduce donor-site morbidity after abdominal flaps, which eventually culminated in the introduction of the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. However, due to anatomical variations (absence of dominant perforators) and the risk of ischaemic complications, the selection of patients qualifying for a DIEP flap is limited. Furthermore, DIEP flaps can only be used as free flaps. We present our long-term experience with a dissection technique of rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAM) flaps that was developed to circumvent these drawbacks. The dissection is characterised by preventing to sacrifice any perforators nourishing the flap and by fully preserving the anterior rectus sheath, but not the muscle. The study comprises a consecutive series of prospectively assessed patients, treated between February 2000 and April 2008. A total of 100 fascia-sparing RAM flaps were operated on 97 patients (age 22-84 years, median 64 years). Free flaps were mainly used for breast reconstruction (47 flaps/24 patients), and cranially (34) or caudally (19) pedicled flaps for soft-tissue coverage after sternectomy, urogenital tumour resection or rectum amputation. Eighty patients had a total of 213 risk factors, such as cardiovascular diseases, obesity, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking or steroid medication. Partial tissue loss (skin or fat necrosis) occurred in 13 flaps, out of which seven required surgical revision. The ischaemic complications were evenly distributed between the patient subsets. At a follow-up of 2-89 months (median 20 months), one patient showed a flap harvest-related abdominal bulge after bilateral-free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap. We conclude that the present dissection technique provides maximal perforator-related perfusion and minimal donor-site morbidity even in pedicled flaps and high-risk patients. In free flaps, it may, therefore, be recommended as an alternative to the DIEP flap.
已经做出了重大努力来减少腹部皮瓣供区的发病率,最终导致了深下腹壁穿支皮瓣(DIEP)的出现。然而,由于解剖学上的变异(缺乏优势穿支)和缺血性并发症的风险,适合 DIEP 皮瓣的患者选择受到限制。此外,DIEP 皮瓣只能作为游离皮瓣使用。我们介绍了我们使用腹直肌肌皮瓣(RAM)游离皮瓣的长期经验,该技术的发展旨在规避这些缺点。这种皮瓣的解剖特点是防止牺牲任何滋养皮瓣的穿支,并充分保留前腹直肌鞘,但不保留肌肉。该研究包括一组连续的前瞻性评估患者,他们于 2000 年 2 月至 2008 年 4 月接受治疗。97 名患者(年龄 22-84 岁,中位年龄 64 岁)共进行了 100 例筋膜保留 RAM 皮瓣手术。游离皮瓣主要用于乳房重建(47 例/24 例),颅侧(34 例)或尾侧(19 例)带蒂皮瓣用于胸骨切除、泌尿生殖系统肿瘤切除或直肠切除后的软组织覆盖。80 名患者共有 213 个危险因素,如心血管疾病、肥胖、高脂血症、糖尿病、吸烟或类固醇药物治疗。13 个皮瓣发生部分组织丢失(皮肤或脂肪坏死),其中 7 个需要手术修复。缺血性并发症在患者亚组中分布均匀。在 2-89 个月(中位时间 20 个月)的随访中,1 名患者在双侧游离横向腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM)皮瓣后出现与皮瓣采集相关的腹部膨出。我们的结论是,即使在带蒂皮瓣和高危患者中,目前的解剖技术也能提供最大的穿支相关灌注和最小的供区发病率。在游离皮瓣中,它可能因此被推荐作为 DIEP 皮瓣的替代方案。