University of Duisburg Essen, Department of Applied Zoology/Hydrobiology, D-45117 Essen, Germany.
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Sep 1;408(19):4007-19. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.031. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
The European Water Framework Directive (WFD), which was adopted in 2000, changed water management in all member states of the European Union fundamentally, putting aquatic ecology at the base of management decisions. Here we review the successes and problems encountered with implementation of the WFD over the past 10years and provide recommendations to further improve the implementation process. We particularly address three fields: (i) the development of assessment methods (including reference conditions, typologies and intercalibration); (ii) the implementation of assessment systems in monitoring programmes; and (iii) the consequences for river basin management plans (such as the design, monitoring and success of restoration measures). The development of assessment methods has been a transparent process and has resulted in improved and more standardised tools for assessing water bodies across Europe. The process has been more time consuming, and methods are more complex, than originally expected. Future challenges still remain, including the estimation of uncertainty of assessment results and a revision of rules in combining the results obtained with different Biological Quality Elements. A huge amount of monitoring data is now being generated for WFD purposes. Monitoring data are not centrally stored and thus poorly accessible for purposes beyond the WFD. Future challenges include enhanced data accessibility and the establishment of a Europe-wide central monitoring network of reference sites. The WFD river basin management plans base management decisions on the response of aquatic organisms to environmental stress. In contrast to the effects of degradation, the biotic response to restoration is less well-known and poorly predictable. The timescale of the WFD (obtaining good ecological status in all surface waters by 2027) is over-ambitious. Future challenges include long-term monitoring of restoration measures to understand the requirements for ecosystems to recover and prioritisation of measures according to re-colonisation potential.
《欧盟水框架指令》(WFD)于 2000 年通过,从根本上改变了所有欧盟成员国的水资源管理方式,将水生生态置于管理决策的基础。本文回顾了过去 10 年实施 WFD 过程中的成功经验和遇到的问题,并提出了进一步改进实施过程的建议。我们特别讨论了三个领域:(i)评估方法的开发(包括基准条件、类型学和相互校准);(ii)在监测计划中实施评估系统;(iii)对流域管理计划的影响(如设计、监测和恢复措施的成功)。评估方法的开发是一个透明的过程,已经为整个欧洲评估水体提供了改进和更标准化的工具。这个过程比最初预期的要耗时更长,方法也更复杂。未来仍面临挑战,包括评估结果不确定性的估计以及修订规则以结合不同生物质量要素的结果。目前,大量监测数据是为 WFD 目的而生成的。监测数据没有集中存储,因此在 WFD 之外的用途中难以获取。未来的挑战包括增强数据的可访问性和建立一个全欧洲范围的基准站点集中监测网络。WFD 的流域管理计划基于水生生物对环境压力的反应来制定管理决策。与退化的影响不同,生物对恢复的反应知之甚少,也难以预测。WFD 的时间跨度(到 2027 年使所有地表水达到良好生态状况)过于雄心勃勃。未来的挑战包括对恢复措施进行长期监测,以了解生态系统恢复的要求,并根据再殖民化潜力对措施进行优先排序。