Li Xiao-miao, Zhang Fang-fang, Sun Xin-ying, Gao Wen-bin
Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2010 Jun 18;42(3):330-4.
To explore the relationship between lifestyle, self-esteem and life satisfaction among Chinese adolescents.
10 899 adolescents in middle schools and colleges from 9 provinces in China were investigated by using Chinese Adolescent Lifestyle Scale (CALS), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES).
The distribution of adolescents in the four groups divided by lifestyle and life satisfaction scores were different regarding the area and grade of these students(chi(2)=248.93, P<0.01;chi(2)=568.53, P<0.01). A high percentage of adolescents in cities (58.9%) reported a healthy life style with high life satisfaction while most adolescents in rural areas (58.9%) reported poor life styles with little satisfaction. A high percentage of junior high school students (61.8%) reported a healthy life style with high life satisfaction, but this percentage among senior high school and college students was down to 48.5% and 21.3% respectively. About 7.6% of senior high school students reported a healthy life style but poor satisfaction, a little higher than that of junior high school students (4.1%) and college students (3.6%). Moreover, there were 71.6% college students reported that they lead a poor life style with little satisfaction. The lifestyle is significantly correlated with self-esteem (r=0.472, P<0.01) and life satisfaction(r=0.636, P<0.01), and self-esteem is also significantly correlated with life satisfaction (r=0.450, P<0.01). self-esteem was the mediator of the other two parameters.
The lifestyle predicts life satisfaction through self-esteem. Area and grade differences have to be taken into consideration when introducing programs on health promotion, and attention should be attached to the influence of psychological factors.
探讨中国青少年生活方式、自尊与生活满意度之间的关系。
采用中国青少年生活方式量表(CALS)、罗森伯格自尊量表(SES)对来自中国9个省份的10899名中学和大学青少年进行调查。
按生活方式和生活满意度得分划分的四组青少年在学生所在地区和年级方面分布不同(χ²=248.93,P<0.01;χ²=568.53,P<0.01)。城市中很大比例(58.9%)的青少年报告生活方式健康且生活满意度高,而农村地区大多数青少年(58.9%)报告生活方式较差且满意度低。很大比例的初中生(61.8%)报告生活方式健康且生活满意度高,但高中生和大学生中的这一比例分别降至48.5%和21.3%。约7.6%的高中生报告生活方式健康但满意度低,略高于初中生(4.1%)和大学生(3.6%)。此外,71.6%的大学生报告他们生活方式较差且满意度低。生活方式与自尊显著相关(r=0.472,P<0.01)和生活满意度(r=0.636,P<0.01),自尊也与生活满意度显著相关(r=0.450,P<0.01)。自尊是另外两个参数的中介变量。
生活方式通过自尊预测生活满意度。在开展健康促进项目时必须考虑地区和年级差异,并应关注心理因素的影响。