Radiology Unit, Head and Neck Department, University of Milan, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2010 Apr;30(2):94-9.
Aim of the study was to assess the different roles of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the evaluation of anatomical origin and pathological nature of lesions involving the masticator space. Overall 41 cases (31 computed tomography and 14 magnetic resonance imaging) of lesions involving masticator space were retrospectively reviewed by two experienced radiologists in consensus. Reference standards were histopathological results and clinical-radiological follow-up after one year. Both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were performed with and without intravenous injection of contrast. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were correct in identifying the space of origin of lesions respectively in 96% and 92% of cases. Computed tomography correctly diagnosed the nature of lesions in 81% of cases and magnetic resonance imaging in 93% of cases; computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging correctly characterized, respectively, 88% and 100% of malignant lesions and, respectively, 73% and 83% of benign lesions. In conclusion both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were effective in the identification of the origin of non-extensive lesions involving masticator space. Computed tomography was more precise in depicting lesions originating from masticator space, while magnetic resonance imaging was more correct in depicting lesions originating from contiguous spaces and involving secondarily the masticator space. Magnetic resonance imaging should always be preferred to characterise lesions, nevertheless computed tomography should be chosen in cases with suspected inflammatory involvement of mandible bone.
本研究旨在评估磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描在评估累及咀嚼间隙病变的解剖起源和病理性质中的不同作用。通过两位有经验的放射科医生共同回顾性分析了 41 例累及咀嚼间隙的病变(31 例计算机断层扫描和 14 例磁共振成像)。参考标准为组织病理学结果和一年后的临床-放射学随访。在静脉注射对比剂和不注射对比剂的情况下,分别对计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像进行了检查。计算机断层扫描分别正确识别病变起源的空间在 96%和 92%的病例中,磁共振成像在 93%的病例中正确诊断病变的性质。计算机断层扫描分别正确地描述了 88%和 100%的恶性病变和 73%和 83%的良性病变,磁共振成像分别正确地描述了 81%和 93%的病变。总之,计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像在识别非广泛累及咀嚼间隙的病变起源方面均有效。计算机断层扫描在描绘起源于咀嚼间隙的病变方面更为准确,而磁共振成像在描绘起源于相邻间隙并继发性累及咀嚼间隙的病变方面更为准确。磁共振成像应始终优先用于描述病变,但在怀疑下颌骨炎症性累及的情况下应选择计算机断层扫描。