Suppr超能文献

40 小时连续清醒对数字比较表现的影响。

The effect of 40 hours of constant wakefulness on number comparison performance.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Chronobiol Int. 2010 Jun;27(4):807-25. doi: 10.3109/07420521003778765.

Abstract

We investigated the effects of sleep loss and circadian rhythm on number comparison performance. Magnitude comparison of single-digits is robustly characterized by a distance effect: Close numbers (e.g., 5 versus 6) produce longer reaction times than numbers further apart (e.g., 2 versus 8). This distance effect is assumed to reflect the difficulty of a comparison process based on an analogous representation of general magnitude. Twelve male participants were required to stay awake for 40 h in a quasi-constant-routine protocol. Response speed and accuracy deteriorated between 00:00 and 06:00 h but recovered afterwards during the next day, indicating a circadian rhythm of elementary cognitive function (i.e., attention and speed of mental processing). The symbolic distance effect, however, did not increase during the nighttime, indicating that neither cumulative sleep loss nor the circadian clock prolongs numerical comparison processes. The present findings provide first evidence for a relative insensitivity of symbolic magnitude processing against the temporal variation in energy state.

摘要

我们研究了睡眠缺失和昼夜节律对数字比较表现的影响。单位数的大小比较具有很强的距离效应:近距离的数字(例如 5 与 6)比远距离的数字(例如 2 与 8)产生更长的反应时间。这种距离效应被认为反映了基于一般大小类似表示的比较过程的难度。12 名男性参与者被要求在准恒常性作息方案中保持清醒 40 小时。反应速度和准确性在 00:00 至 06:00 之间下降,但在接下来的一天中恢复,表明基本认知功能(即注意力和心理处理速度)存在昼夜节律。然而,符号距离效应在夜间并没有增加,这表明累积的睡眠缺失或生物钟都不会延长数字比较过程。本研究结果首次提供了证据,证明符号大小处理对能量状态的时间变化相对不敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验