Bratzke Daniel, Rolke Bettina, Steinborn Michael B, Ulrich Rolf
Cognitive and Biological Psychology, Psychologisches Institut, University of Tübingen, Friedrichstrasse 21, Tübingen 72072, Germany.
J Sleep Res. 2009 Jun;18(2):167-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00729.x.
This study investigated efficiency of switching between different tasks in 12 male participants (19-30 years) during 40 h of constant wakefulness. As index of task-switching efficiency, switch costs in reaction time were assessed every 3 h under controlled behavioural and environmental conditions. Overall reaction times and switch costs showed a temporal pattern consistent with the assumption of a combined influence of a sleep homeostatic and a circadian process. An additional analysis indicated that the variation in switch costs could not be attributed to interference of the current task with persisting activation from preceding tasks. We therefore conclude that sleep loss and the circadian system affect the ability to prepare the current task rather than automatic processing of irrelevant stimulus information.
本研究调查了12名男性参与者(19 - 30岁)在持续清醒40小时期间进行不同任务切换的效率。作为任务切换效率的指标,在可控的行为和环境条件下,每3小时评估一次反应时间中的切换成本。总体反应时间和切换成本呈现出一种时间模式,这与睡眠稳态和昼夜节律过程综合影响的假设相一致。进一步分析表明,切换成本的变化不能归因于当前任务对先前任务持续激活的干扰。因此,我们得出结论,睡眠缺失和昼夜节律系统会影响准备当前任务的能力,而非对无关刺激信息的自动处理。