Advanced Heart Disease Section, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass 02115, USA.
Circ Heart Fail. 2010 Sep;3(5):580-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.923300. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
Intracardiac pressures in heart failure (HF) have been measured in patients while supine in the hospital but change at home with posture and activity. The optimal level of chronic ambulatory pressure is unknown. This analysis compared chronic intracardiac pressures to later HF events and sought a threshold above which higher pressures conferred worse outcomes.
Median pressures were measured every 24 hours from continuous 8-minute segments for 6 months after implantation of hemodynamic monitors in 261 patients with New York Heart Association class III-IV HF in the Chronicle Offers Management to Patients with Advanced Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure Study. Baseline and chronic daily medians of estimated pulmonary artery diastolic, right ventricular systolic, and right ventricular end-diastolic pressures were compared with HF event rate. The group median for chronic 24-hour estimated pulmonary artery diastolic pressure was 28 mm Hg (excluding 7 days before and after events). Despite weight-guided management, events occurred in 100 of 261 (38%) patients. Event risk increased progressively with higher chronic 24-hour estimated pulmonary artery diastolic pressure, from 20% at 18 mm Hg to 34% at 25 mm Hg and 56% at 30 mm Hg, with similar relations for right ventricular pressures. Among patients with baseline day median estimated pulmonary artery diastolic pressures of ≥25 mm Hg, event risk was 1.10/6 mo when they remained chronically ≥25 mm Hg, but risk fell to 0.47 when 24-hour pressures declined to <25 mm Hg for more than half of the days.
Despite current management, many patients with advanced HF live on a plateau of high filling pressures from which later events occur. This risk is progressively higher with higher chronic ambulatory pressures. It is not known whether more targeted intervention could maintain lower chronic ambulatory pressures and better outcomes.
心力衰竭(HF)患者在医院卧床时已测量过心脏内压,但在家中体位和活动改变时会发生变化。慢性动态压力的最佳水平尚不清楚。本分析将慢性心内压与以后的 HF 事件进行了比较,并寻求了一个较高压力导致较差结果的阈值。
在 Chronicle Offers Management to Patients with Advanced Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure 研究中,对 261 名纽约心脏协会(NYHA)III-IV 级 HF 患者在植入血流动力学监测器后 6 个月内,每 24 小时进行 8 分钟连续片段的中位压力测量。将基线和慢性每日中位估计肺动脉舒张压、右心室收缩压和右心室舒张末期压与 HF 事件发生率进行比较。慢性 24 小时估计肺动脉舒张压的组中位值为 28mmHg(不包括事件前后 7 天)。尽管进行了体重指导管理,但在 261 名患者中有 100 名(38%)发生了事件。事件风险随慢性 24 小时估计肺动脉舒张压升高而逐渐增加,从 18mmHg 时的 20%增加到 25mmHg 时的 34%和 30mmHg 时的 56%,右心室压力也存在类似关系。在基线日中位估计肺动脉舒张压≥25mmHg 的患者中,当他们的慢性压力持续≥25mmHg 时,事件风险为 1.10/6 个月,但当 24 小时压力下降到超过一半天数时<25mmHg 时,风险下降到 0.47。
尽管进行了当前的管理,许多患有晚期 HF 的患者仍处于高充盈压力的平台期,此后会发生事件。随着慢性动态压力的升高,这种风险逐渐增加。尚不清楚更有针对性的干预是否可以维持较低的慢性动态压力和更好的结果。